Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29970832›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2018

Application of Fraser's "Practical" Ethic in Veterinary Practice, and Its Compatibility with a "One Welfare" Framework.

Anne Fawcett, Siobhan Mullan, Paul McGreevy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. One welfare: bibliometric review of world literature.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Interrupted Lives: Welfare Considerations in Wildlife Rehabilitation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Animal Harms and Food Production: Informing Ethical Choices.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne FawcettSydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia. anne.fawcett@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5122-0068
Siobhan MullanSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford BS40 5DU, UK. Siobhan.mullan@bristol.ac.uk.
Paul McGreevySydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia. paul.mcgreevy@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethically challenging situations are common in veterinary practice, and they may be a source of moral stress, which may in turn impact the welfare of veterinarians. Despite recognition of the importance of ethical reasoning, some veterinary students may struggle to apply theoretical ethical frameworks. Fraser developed a “practical” ethic consisting of four principles that can be applied to ethically challenging situations. We apply Fraser’s “practical” ethic to three cases that veterinarians may encounter: animal hoarding, animal neglect, and treatment of wildlife. We argue that Fraser’s “practical” ethic is consistent with a One Welfare framework, and may have increasing currency for veterinarians in the light of the World Animal Health Organisation’s Global Animal Welfare Strategy. Both Fraser’s “practical” ethic and a One Welfare framework require veterinarians to consider the impacts of animal ethics decisions on a broader scale than most other ethical frameworks have prepared them for. We discuss the strengths and limitations of Fraser’s “practical” ethic when applied in veterinary contexts and recommend additional support and training to enable veterinarians to effectively apply these frameworks in real-world settings.

Indexed as

animal ethicsethical frameworksethically challenging situationsOne Welfarepractical ethicveterinaryveterinary education

Identifiers

PMID29970832
PMCPMC6071015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.