Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29970767›Full record

ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society

Evaluation of Xpert

Nikhil C Gowda, Animesh Ray, Manish Soneja, Arjun Khanna, Sanjeev Sinha

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review and Updates on the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ComparingInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikhil C GowdaDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Animesh RayDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Manish SonejaDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Arjun KhannaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Yashoda Superspeciality Hospital, Kaushambi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sanjeev SinhaDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INYashoda Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSputum smear-negative and sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is a diagnostic challenge. Xpert

aimsThe aim of this study is to evaluate Xpert SETTINGS: Tertiary care hospital in India.

designThis was prospective observational study. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween January 2015 and November 2016, we prospectively recruited sputum-smear negative and sputum-scarce patients under evaluation for PTB and performed BAL. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated for the diagnosis of PTB on BAL fluid for acid-fast bacilli smear and Xpert

resultsOf the 60 patients included, 52 (88.3%) had a final diagnosis of PTB and 16 (26.7%) were culture confirmed. Xpert

conclusionsIn sputum smear-negative and sputum-scarce patients with clinico-radiological features of PTB Xpert

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar lavagebronchoscopydiagnosispulmonarytuberculosisXpert

Identifiers

PMID29970767
PMCPMC6034363
OpenAlexW2810488933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.