ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2018
Usefulness of the Addition of Renal Function to the CHA2DS2-VASc Score as a Predictor of Thromboembolism and Mortality in Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age-Dependent Role of Genetics and Renal Function for Atrial Fibrillation Development in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
- Multifactorial Risk Stratification in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association between RInternal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Comparing Atrial-Fibrillation Validated Rapid Scoring Systems in the Long-Term Mortality Prediction in Patients Referred for Elective Coronary Angiography: A Subanalysis of the Białystok Coronary Project.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Research is conflicting whether kidney function should be incorporated in thromboembolism risk prediction. Our published data showed that the CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts thromboembolism and mortality in those without atrial fibrillation. We used the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records system to retrospectively evaluate whether adding renal impairment (1 point) to the CHA2DS2-VASc score (-R) enhances the score's prediction of mortality, thromboembolism, and atrial fibrillation in patients without atrial fibrillation. We identified patients that had an implantable cardiac monitoring device placed from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2013, which was defined as the start date. Follow-up was through March 7, 2016. An implantable device was required to discern the absence of atrial fibrillation. Renal impairment was defined as chronic kidney disease stage 3 or greater. The population (n = 1,606) had a mean age of 69.8 years and median follow-up of 4.8 years. Baseline renal impairment was predictive of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64 to 2.60, p <0.001), thromboembolism (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.87, p = 0.09), and atrial fibrillation (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.74, p = 0.07). Lower glomerular filtration rate correlated significantly with mortality. Increasing CHA2DS2-VASc-R score correlated significantly with mortality, thromboembolism, and incident atrial fibrillation. The addition of renal impairment to the CHA2DS2-VASc score improved the C-statistics for thromboembolism and survival from 0.72 to 0.73 (p = 0.01) and 0.70 to 0.72 (p <0.001). Adding renal impairment to the CHA2DS2-VASc score improves the score's prediction of thromboembolism and mortality in a population without atrial fibrillation, although the incremental benefit appears mild.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.