Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29970096›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2018

Computer-aided prediction of antigen presenting cell modulators for designing peptide-based vaccine adjuvants.

Gandharva Nagpal, Kumardeep Chaudhary, Piyush Agrawal, Gajendra P S Raghava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A large language model for predicting neurotoxic peptides and neurotoxins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interpretable molecular encodings and representations for machine learning tasks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gandharva NagpalBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, 160036, India.
Kumardeep ChaudharyBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, 160036, India.
Piyush AgrawalBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, 160036, India.
Gajendra P S RaghavaBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, 160036, India. raghava@iiitd.ac.in.
Institute of Microbial Technology · INIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi · IN

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research GENESIS BSC0121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidences in literature strongly advocate the potential of immunomodulatory peptides for use as vaccine adjuvants. All the mechanisms of vaccine adjuvants ensuing immunostimulatory effects directly or indirectly stimulate antigen presenting cells (APCs). While numerous methods have been developed in the past for predicting B cell and T-cell epitopes; no method is available for predicting the peptides that can modulate the APCs.

methodsWe named the peptides that can activate APCs as A-cell epitopes and developed methods for their prediction in this study. A dataset of experimentally validated A-cell epitopes was collected and compiled from various resources. To predict A-cell epitopes, we developed support vector machine-based machine learning models using different sequence-based features.

resultsA hybrid model developed on a combination of sequence-based features (dipeptide composition and motif occurrence), achieved the highest accuracy of 95.71% with Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) value of 0.91 on the training dataset. We also evaluated the hybrid models on an independent dataset and achieved a comparable accuracy of 95.00% with MCC 0.90.

conclusionThe models developed in this study were implemented in a web-based platform VaxinPAD to predict and design immunomodulatory peptides or A-cell epitopes. This web server available at http://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/vaxinpad/ will facilitate researchers in designing peptide-based vaccine adjuvants.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDrug DesignAdjuvants, ImmunologicAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceAntigen-Presenting CellsDatabases, ProteinEpitopesHumansImmunologic FactorsInternetModels, TheoreticalSupport Vector MachineUser-Computer InterfaceVaccines, SubunitAdjuvants, ImmunologicEpitopesImmunologic FactorsVaccines, SubunitA-cell epitopesAdjuvantsAntigen presenting cellsImmunomodulatory peptideSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID29970096
PMCPMC6029051
OpenAlexW2776648280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.