Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29970079›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

A comparative study on the frequency of simulation-based training and assessment of non-technical skills in the Norwegian ground ambulance services and helicopter emergency medical services.

Henrik Langdalen, Eirik B Abrahamsen, Stephen J M Sollid, Leif Inge K Sørskår, Håkon B Abrahamsen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrik LangdalenDepartment of Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Stavanger, Norway. henrik.langdalen@uis.no.ORCID 0000-0001-5716-3431
Eirik B AbrahamsenDepartment of Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Stavanger, Norway.
Stephen J M SollidDepartment of Quality and Health Technology, University of Stavanger, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stavanger, Norway.
Leif Inge K SørskårDepartment of Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Stavanger, Norway.
Håkon B AbrahamsenDepartment of Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Stavanger, Norway.
University of Stavanger · NOStavanger University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInadequate non-technical skills (NTSs) among employees in the Norwegian prehospital emergency medical services (EMSs) are a risk for patient and operational safety. Simulation-based training and assessment is promising with respect to improving NTSs. The frequency of simulation-based training in and assessment of NTSs among crewmembers in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) has gained increased attention over recent years, whereas there has been much less focus on the Norwegian ground emergency medical service (GEMS). The aim of the study was to compare and document the frequencies of simulation-based training in and assessment of seven NTSs between the Norwegian HEMS and GEMS, conditional on workplace and occupation.

methodA comparative study of the results from cross-sectional questionnaires responded to by employees in the Norwegian prehospital EMSs in 2016 regarding training in and assessment of NTSs during 2015, with a focus on the Norwegian GEMS and HEMS. Professional groups of interest are: pilots, HEMS crew members (HCMs), physicians, paramedics, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), EMT apprentices, nurses and nurses with an EMT licence.

resultsThe frequency of simulation-based training in and assessment of seven generic NTSs was statistically significantly greater for HEMS than for GEMS during 2015. Compared with pilots and HCMs, other health care providers in GEMS and HEMS undergo statistically significantly less frequent simulation-based training in and assessment of NTSs. Physicians working in the HEMS appear to be undergoing training and assessment more frequently than the rest of the health trust employees. The study indicates a tendency for lesser focus on the assessment of NTSs compared to simulation-based training.

conclusionHEMS has become superior to GEMS, in terms of frequency of training in and assessment of NTSs. The low frequency of training in and assessment of NTSs in GEMS suggests that there is a great potential to learn from HEMS and to strengthen the focus on NTSs. Increased frequency of assessment of NTSs in both HEMS and GEMS is called for.

Indexed as

Air AmbulancesAmbulancesAircraftAllied Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Medical TechniciansEmergency NursingHumansInservice TrainingNorwayPhysiciansPilotsProfessional CompetenceSafetySimulation TrainingAmbulanceAssessmentEmergency medical serviceHelicopterLearningNon-technical skillsSimulation-based training

Identifiers

PMID29970079
PMCPMC6029269
OpenAlexW2811373545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.