Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29970072›Full record

Trial reportBMC complementary and alternative medicine2018

Reducing antibiotic use for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in general practice by treatment with uva-ursi (REGATTA) - a double-blind, randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness trial.

Kambiz Afshar, Nina Fleischmann, Guido Schmiemann, Jutta Bleidorn, Eva Hummers-Pradier, Tim Friede, Karl Wegscheider, Michael Moore, Ildikó Gágyor

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03151603 (Reducing Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in General Practice by Treatment With Uva Ursi), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03151603 phase4completednot on this map

Reducing Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in General Practice by Treatment With Uva Ursi (UU)- a Comparative Effectiveness Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GoettingenRan2017 to 2019Enrolled398ConditionsUrinary Tract InfectionsArmsArctuvan, Fosfomycin, Placebo to Arctuvan, Placebo to Fosfomycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Gellan Gum/Alginate Films Containing BiogenicMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Chemical Characteristics and Antimicrobial Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. BMJ open · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kambiz AfsharInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Nina FleischmannDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Guido SchmiemannDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Jutta BleidornInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Eva Hummers-PradierDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Karl WegscheiderDepartment of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael MoorePrimary Care and Population Science, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK.
Ildikó GágyorDepartment of General Practice, Universitätsklinikum Wurzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2/D7, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. gagyor_i@ukw.de.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Bremen · DEUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung FK 01KG1601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in general practice and usually treated with antibiotics. This contributes to increasing resistance rates of uropathogenic bacteria. A previous trial showed a reduction of antibiotic use in women with UTI by initial symptomatic treatment with ibuprofen. However, this treatment strategy is not suitable for all women equally. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (UU, bearberry extract arbutin) is a potential alternative treatment. This study aims at investigating whether an initial treatment with UU in women with UTI can reduce antibiotic use without significantly increasing the symptom burden or rate of complications.

methodsThis is a double-blind, randomized, and controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Women between 18 and 75 years with suspected UTI and at least two of the symptoms dysuria, urgency, frequency or lower abdominal pain will be assessed for eligibility in general practice and enrolled into the trial. Participants will receive either a defined daily dose of 3 × 2 arbutin 105 mg for 5 days (intervention) or fosfomycin 3 g once (control). Antibiotic therapy will be provided in the intervention group only if needed, i.e. for women with worsening or persistent symptoms. Two co-primary outcomes are the number of all antibiotic courses regardless of the medical indication from day 0-28, and the symptom burden, defined as a weighted sum of the daily total symptom scores from day 0-7. The trial result is considered positive if superiority of initial treatment with UU is demonstrated with reference to the co-primary outcome number of antibiotic courses and non-inferiority of initial treatment with UU with reference to the co-primary outcome symptom burden. DISCUSSION: The trial's aim is to investigate whether initial treatment with UU is a safe and effective alternative treatment strategy in women with UTI. In that case, the results might change the existing treatment strategy in general practice by promoting delayed prescription of antibiotics and a reduction of antibiotic use in primary care.

trial registrationEudraCT: 2016-000477-21 . Clinical trials.gov: NCT03151603 (registered: 10 May 2017).

Indexed as

ArctostaphylosPhytotherapyAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPlant ExtractsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Tract InfectionsYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsPlant ExtractsAntibiotic prescriptionArctostaphylos uva-ursiComparative effectiveness designGeneral practiceHerbal remedy

Identifiers

PMID29970072
PMCPMC6029138
OpenAlexW2810762472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.