Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29970033›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Effect of early and intensive nutrition care, delivered via telephone or mobile application, on quality of life in people with upper gastrointestinal cancer: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Lauren Hanna, Catherine E Huggins, Kate Furness, Mary Anne Silvers, June Savva, Helena Frawley, Daniel Croagh, Paul Cashin, Liang Low, Judith Bauer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The roles of the dietitian in an 18-week telephone and mobile application nutrition intervention for upper gastrointestinal cancer: a qualitative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nutritional challenges of gastric cancer patients from the perspectives of patients, family caregivers, and health professionals: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Late referral of cancer patients with malnutrition to dietitians: a prospective study of clinical practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  18. [Prerehabilitation in frail patients : Frailty as a risk factor].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren HannaNutrition and Dietetics, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Catherine E HugginsDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. Kate.Huggins@monash.edu.
Kate FurnessNutrition and Dietetics, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Mary Anne SilversNutrition and Dietetics, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
June SavvaNutrition and Dietetics, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Helena FrawleyDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Daniel CroaghUpper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Paul CashinUpper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Liang LowUpper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Judith BauerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Helen TrubyDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Terrence HainesDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Monash Medical Centre · AUMonash University · AUCabrini Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

Victorian Cancer Agency HSR15007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major challenge for those living with cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract (oesophagus, stomach and pancreas), is the impact of the disease and treatment on nutritional status and quality of life. People with cancer and malnutrition have a greater risk of morbidity and mortality. Nutrition intervention is recommended to commence immediately in those who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. Novel cost-effective approaches that can deliver early, pre-hospital nutrition intervention before usual hospital dietetic service is commenced are needed. Linking clinicians and patients via mobile health (mHealth) and wireless technologies is a contemporary solution not yet tested for delivery of nutrition therapy to people with cancer. The aim of this study is to commence nutrition intervention earlier than usual care and evaluate the effects of using the telephone or mHealth for intervention delivery. It is hypothesised that participants allocated to receive the early and intensive pre-hospital dietetic service will have more quality-adjusted life years lived compared with control participants. This study will also demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of mHealth for the nutrition management of patients at home undergoing cancer treatment.

methodsThis study is a prospective three-group randomised controlled trial, with a concurrent economic evaluation. The 18 week intervention is provided in addition to usual care and is delivered by two different modes, via telephone (group 1) or via mHealth (group 2), The control group receives usual care alone (group 3). The intervention is an individually tailored, symptom-directed nutritional behavioural management program led by a dietitian. Participants will have at least fortnightly reviews. The primary outcome is quality adjusted life years lived and secondary outcomes include markers of nutritional status. Outcomes will be measured at three, six and 12 months follow up. DISCUSSION: The findings will provide evidence of a strategy to implement early and intensive nutrition intervention outside the hospital setting that can favourably impact on quality of life and nutritional status. This patient-centred approach is relevant to current health service provision and challenges the current reactive delivery model of care.

trial registration27th January 2017 Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ( ACTRN12617000152325 ).

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsNutrition TherapyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelephoneUpper Gastrointestinal TractGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansNutritional StatusOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesCost-effectivenessDietetic interventionGastric cancerMalnutritionmHealthOesophageal cancerPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID29970033
PMCPMC6029372
OpenAlexW2810480195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.