Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29970003›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Prediction of RNA-protein sequence and structure binding preferences using deep convolutional and recurrent neural networks.

Xiaoyong Pan, Peter Rijnbeek, Junchi Yan, Hong-Bin Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. mArXiv · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Synthetic short RNA in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. RNA-binding proteins connect Exon usage to the chromatin.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification of RNA structures and their roles in RNA functions.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Big data and deep learning for RNA biology.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoyong PanDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. xypan172436@gmail.com.
Peter RijnbeekDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Junchi YanInstitute of Software Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Hong-Bin ShenInstitute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai, China. hbshen@sjtu.edu.cn.
Erasmus MC · NLInstitute of Software · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61462018National Natural Science Foundation of China 61671288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA regulation is significantly dependent on its binding protein partner, known as the RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Unfortunately, the binding preferences for most RBPs are still not well characterized. Interdependencies between sequence and secondary structure specificities is challenging for both predicting RBP binding sites and accurate sequence and structure motifs detection.

resultsIn this study, we propose a deep learning-based method, iDeepS, to simultaneously identify the binding sequence and structure motifs from RNA sequences using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and a bidirectional long short term memory network (BLSTM). We first perform one-hot encoding for both the sequence and predicted secondary structure, to enable subsequent convolution operations. To reveal the hidden binding knowledge from the observed sequences, the CNNs are applied to learn the abstract features. Considering the close relationship between sequence and predicted structures, we use the BLSTM to capture possible long range dependencies between binding sequence and structure motifs identified by the CNNs. Finally, the learned weighted representations are fed into a classification layer to predict the RBP binding sites. We evaluated iDeepS on verified RBP binding sites derived from large-scale representative CLIP-seq datasets. The results demonstrate that iDeepS can reliably predict the RBP binding sites on RNAs, and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. An important advantage compared to other methods is that iDeepS can automatically extract both binding sequence and structure motifs, which will improve our understanding of the mechanisms of binding specificities of RBPs.

conclusionOur study shows that the iDeepS method identifies the sequence and structure motifs to accurately predict RBP binding sites. iDeepS is available at https://github.com/xypan1232/iDeepS .

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsBinding SitesComputational BiologyNucleic Acid ConformationNucleotide MotifsProtein BindingRNARNA-Binding ProteinsUser-Computer InterfaceRNARNA-Binding ProteinsBidirectional long short term memory networkConvolutional neural networkRNA-binding proteinSequence motifsStructure motifs

Identifiers

PMID29970003
PMCPMC6029131
OpenAlexW2951748044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.