ArticleBMC genomics2018
Prediction of RNA-protein sequence and structure binding preferences using deep convolutional and recurrent neural networks.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
111 citing papers in PubMed, 266 citations in OpenAlex.
- mArXiv · 2026Article
- Augmented prediction of multi-species protein-RNA interactions using evolutionary conservation of RNA-binding proteins.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Synthetic short RNA in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- RNA-binding proteins connect Exon usage to the chromatin.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- ERNIE-RNA: an RNA language model with structure-enhanced representations.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models and Generative Algorithms Represent a New Paradigm for Genomics Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Base-resolution binding profile prediction of proteins on RNAs with deep learning.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Unravelling the conundrum of nucleolar NR2F1 localization using antibody-based approaches in vitro and in vivo.Communications biology · 2025Article
- RBPsuite 2.0: an updated RNA-protein binding site prediction suite with high coverage on species and proteins based on deep learning.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Old players and new insights: unraveling the role of RNA-binding proteins in brain tumors.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Targeting RNA-binding proteins with small molecules: perspectives and challenges.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
- EnrichRBP: an automated and interpretable computational platform for predicting and analysing RNA-binding protein events.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- DeepMiRBP: a hybrid model for predicting microRNA-protein interactions based on transfer learning and cosine similarity.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- RNA-protein interaction prediction without high-throughput data: An overview and benchmark ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Identification of RNA structures and their roles in RNA functions.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024Review
- AptaDiff: de novo design and optimization of aptamers based on diffusion models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Big data and deep learning for RNA biology.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Proformer: a hybrid macaron transformer model predicts expression values from promoter sequences.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Graphylo: A deep learning approach for predicting regulatory DNA and RNA sites from whole-genome multiple alignments.iScience · 2024Article
51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRNA regulation is significantly dependent on its binding protein partner, known as the RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Unfortunately, the binding preferences for most RBPs are still not well characterized. Interdependencies between sequence and secondary structure specificities is challenging for both predicting RBP binding sites and accurate sequence and structure motifs detection.
resultsIn this study, we propose a deep learning-based method, iDeepS, to simultaneously identify the binding sequence and structure motifs from RNA sequences using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and a bidirectional long short term memory network (BLSTM). We first perform one-hot encoding for both the sequence and predicted secondary structure, to enable subsequent convolution operations. To reveal the hidden binding knowledge from the observed sequences, the CNNs are applied to learn the abstract features. Considering the close relationship between sequence and predicted structures, we use the BLSTM to capture possible long range dependencies between binding sequence and structure motifs identified by the CNNs. Finally, the learned weighted representations are fed into a classification layer to predict the RBP binding sites. We evaluated iDeepS on verified RBP binding sites derived from large-scale representative CLIP-seq datasets. The results demonstrate that iDeepS can reliably predict the RBP binding sites on RNAs, and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. An important advantage compared to other methods is that iDeepS can automatically extract both binding sequence and structure motifs, which will improve our understanding of the mechanisms of binding specificities of RBPs.
conclusionOur study shows that the iDeepS method identifies the sequence and structure motifs to accurately predict RBP binding sites. iDeepS is available at https://github.com/xypan1232/iDeepS .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.