Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29969977›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STD & AIDS2018

Characteristics associated with lack of HIV testing during pregnancy and delivery in 36 U.S. states, 2004-2013.

Emilia H Koumans, Ayanna Harrison, L Duane House, Kim Burley, Nan Ruffo, Ruben Smith, Lauren FitzHarris, Christopher H Johnson, Allan W Taylor, Steven R Nesheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Examination of a Canadian provincial prenatal HIV screening program: 2010 to 2014.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilia H Koumans1 Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-2107
Ayanna Harrison1 Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
L Duane House1 Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kim Burley1 Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nan Ruffo1 Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ruben Smith1 Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lauren FitzHarris3 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Christopher H Johnson3 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Allan W Taylor3 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Steven R Nesheim3 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend universal prenatal HIV testing to prevent perinatal HIV transmission in the U.S.; since the 1990s perinatal HIV transmission has declined. In 2006, 74% of women with a recent live birth reported testing for HIV prenatally or at delivery. We used Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data from 36 states and New York City from 2004 to 2013 (N = 387,424) to assess characteristics associated with lack of self-reported testing and state-to-state variability in these associations. Overall, 75.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75.0-75.5) of women with a recent live birth reported an HIV test. There were significant differences in testing prevalence by state, ranging from 91.8% (95% CI 91.0-92.6) in New York to 42.3% (95% CI 41.7-43.5) in Utah. In adjusted analysis, characteristics associated with no reported testing included being married, white, non-Hispanic, multiparous, not smoking during pregnancy, and having neither Medicaid nor Special Supplemental Nutritional Program for Women, Infants, and Children. White married women were 57% (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.52-1.63) more likely to report no test compared to white unmarried women. Multiparous married women were 57% (aPR 1.57, 95% CI 1.51-1.64) more likely to report no test compared to multiparous unmarried women. Women who were married, white, non-Hispanic, and multiparous women were 23% less likely to be tested than other women combined. Marital status was significantly associated with lower prevalence of testing in 35 of the 37 reporting areas, and race was significant in 30 of 35 states with race information. The prevalence of reported HIV testing during pregnancy or at delivery remains below 80%. Opportunities exist to increase HIV testing among pregnant women, particularly among certain subpopulations.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesPostnatal CarePreconception CarePrenatal CareAdultBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHIVHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePregnancydisparitiesHIVmother-to-child transmissionpregnancyPregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Systemprenatalpreventionscreeningtesting

Identifiers

PMID29969977
PMCPMC6698709
OpenAlexW2810314000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.