ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2018
Natural history of disease activity and damage in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Litifilimab efficacy on skin outcomes in cutaneous lupus erythematosus in the Phase 2 LILAC study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Trial
- Recommendations for the use of CLASI as an outcome measure in cutaneous lupus erythematosus clinical trials.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Smoking status is a negative predictor of six-month cutaneous lupus activity trends: A prospective cohort study.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2025Article
- Association of the Spectrum of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus with Disease Activity and Systemic Manifestations in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2024Article
- Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: An Update on Pathogenesis and Future Therapeutic Directions.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023Review
- Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors in Patients With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Development of a working core outcome set for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a practical approach to an urgent unmet need.Lupus science & medicine · 2021Review
- Modular gene analysis reveals distinct molecular signatures for subsets of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.The British journal of dermatology · 2021Article
- Robust measurement of clinical improvement in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.Lupus science & medicine · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLong-term studies characterizing disease course of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) patients on standard-of-care treatments are lacking.
objectiveWe characterized and compared disease course of CLE patients using Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI).
methodsIn total, 83 CLE patients with CLASI scores collected from ≥3 study visits within 2 years had disease activity and damage trends calculated by average change scores (ACS). Trends were classified as improved (ACS ≤-3), worsened (ACS ≥3), or stable (-3 < ACS < 3). Linear regression models compared CLASI trends between groups.
resultsMost patients (72.73%) with initial CLASI activity (CLASI-A) scores >9 (N = 33) had improved disease activity versus 14.00% of those with initial CLASI-A scores ≤9 (N = 50). Linear regression analyses showed significant improvement in CLASI-A scores in patients of minority races (P < .05), with baseline CLASI-A scores >9 (P < .0001), baseline CLASI damage (CLASI-D) scores ≥10 (P = .0001), and CLE disease duration ≤1 year (P = .01). Of 28 patients with baseline CLASI-D scores ≥10, 35.71% had improvements in damage, while 5.26% of patients with initial CLASI-D scores of 5-9 (N = 19) and 0% with initial CLASI-D scores <5 (N = 36) (P = .0005) had improvements. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include small sample size.
conclusionBaseline CLASI-A score >9, minority race, and short disease duration predict CLE disease activity improvement. A baseline CLASI-D score ≥10 is associated with disease damage improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.