ArticleJournal of structural biology2018
Processing apoferritin with the Appion pipeline.
Article in Journal of structural biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The conformational landscape of human transthyretin revealed by cryo-EM.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025Article
- The conformational landscape of human transthyretin revealed by cryo-EM.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Scaling up cryo-EM for biology and chemistry: The journey from niche technology to mainstream method.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2023Review
- Comparing cryo-EM structures.Journal of structural biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 3DEM map challenge provided an opportunity to test different algorithms and workflows for processing single particle cryo-EM data. We were interested in testing whether we could use the standard Appion workflow with minimal manual intervention to achieve similar or better resolution than other challengers. Another question we were interested in testing was what the influence of particle sorting and elimination would be on the resolution and quality of 3D reconstructions. Since apoferritin is historically a challenging particle for single particle reconstruction and the authors of the original map challenge data used only a fraction of the particles present in the dataset, we focused on the apoferritin dataset for our entry. We submitted a 3.7 Å map from 25,844 particles and a 3.6 Å map from 53,334 particles and after assessment were among the best of the apoferritin maps that were submitted. Here we present the details of our reconstruction strategy and compare our strategy to that of another high-scoring apoferritin map. Altogether, our results suggest that for a relatively conformationally homogeneous particle like apoferritin, including as many particles as possible after elimination of junk leads to the highest resolution, and the choice of parameters for custom mask creation can lead to subtle but significant changes in the resolution of 3D reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.