Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29969093›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2018

Development of the PEA-PODS (Perceptions of the Environment and Patterns of Diet at School) Survey for Students.

Hannah G Lane, Rebecca Driessen, Katherine Campbell, Rachel Deitch, Lindsey Turner, Elizabeth A Parker, Erin R Hager

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah G LaneUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Growth and Nutrition, 737 W Lombard St, Room 169C, Baltimore, MD 21201. Email: hlane@som.umaryland.edu.
Rebecca DriessenCreighton University School of Medicine.
Katherine CampbellUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Growth and Nutrition.
Rachel DeitchUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Growth and Nutrition.
Lindsey TurnerBoise State University, Initiative for Healthy Schools, College of Education.
Elizabeth A ParkerUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Integrative Medicine.
Erin R HagerUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Growth and Nutrition.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USBoise State University · USCreighton University · US

Funding

Summer Program in Obesity, Diabetes and Nutrition Training (SPORT)T35DK095737 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI STEINLE, NANETTE I · 2012 to 2021
$859k
Student Wellness Champions for Change: engaging student leaders in enhancing wellness policy implementation through participation and advocacyF32DK115146 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LANE, HANNAH G · 2017 to 2018
$121k
NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK115146NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK095737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFew instruments assess key outcomes of school-based obesity interventions, including student perceptions of school environments and school-specific dietary intake patterns. This study describes development of PEA-PODS (Perceptions of the Environment and Patterns of Diet at School), a 2-part survey to measure these outcomes.

methodsPart 1 (PEA) assessed student perceptions of policies, physical environment, and practices related to healthy eating and physical activity at school. Part 2 (PODS) assessed usual intake (ie, frequency, location obtained, and foods consumed) of breakfast and lunch. Foods consumed were presented by MyPlate categories (eg, Fruits, Grains). Students in grades 3, 6, and 9 participated in 2 phases: cognitive pre-testing (n = 10) and reliability/validation testing (n = 58). Both surveys were administered 1 week apart to assess test-retest reliability and 5-day food records validated PODS. Analyses included percent agreement (70% = acceptable), Pearson correlations, and Cronbach α.

resultsCognitive pre-testing provided feedback on content, length, and age-appropriateness. Percent agreements were acceptable for test-retest reliability of PEA (71%-96%). The final version included 34 items with Likert-type responses in 4 subscales (α ≥0.78). For PODS, agreement for breakfast and lunch location was ≥75% for both reliability and validation. For foods consumed at breakfast, reliability agreement ranged from 74% to 93%, and validation agreement from 68% to 91%. For foods consumed at lunch, agreement ranges were 76% to 95% and 73% to 88%, respectively.

conclusionBoth parts of the instrument demonstrate acceptable reliability, and PODS demonstrates acceptable validity. This demonstrates appropriateness for assessing perceptions of the environment and usual dietary intake patterns for school-based obesity prevention initiatives.

Indexed as

Diet SurveysFood ServicesChildDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleNutrition PolicyObesityReproducibility of ResultsSchool Health ServicesSchoolsStudents

Identifiers

PMID29969093
PMCPMC6040598
OpenAlexW2809851134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.