Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29969071›Full record

ArticleRadiology2018

An Intravascular Tantalum Oxide-based CT Contrast Agent: Preclinical Evaluation Emulating Overweight and Obese Patient Size.

Jack W Lambert, Yuxin Sun, Carol Stillson, Zhixi Li, Rahi Kumar, Sizhe Wang, Paul F FitzGerald, Peter J Bonitatibus, Robert E Colborn, Jeannette C Roberts and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Fusing Positive and Negative CT Contrast Nanoagent for the Sensitive Detection of Hepatoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack W LambertFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Yuxin SunFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Carol StillsonFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Zhixi LiFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Rahi KumarFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Sizhe WangFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Paul F FitzGeraldFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Peter J BonitatibusFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Robert E ColbornFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Jeannette C RobertsFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Peter M EdicFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Michael MarinoFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
Benjamin M YehFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.W.L., Y.S., C.S., Z.L., R.K., S.W., B.M.Y.); and Departments of Imaging (P.F.F., P.M.E.) and Biosciences (P.J.B., R.E.C., J.C.R., M.M.), GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-2174-3009
University of California System · US

Funding

Nanoparticle CT Contrast Agents for Reduced Radiation Dose and New Imaging ApplicR01EB015476 · NIBIB · GENERAL ELECTRIC GLOBAL RESEARCH CTR · PI EDIC, PETER, YEH, BENJAMIN M · 2013 to 2016
$3.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To compare the CT imaging performance of a carboxybetaine zwitterionic-coated tantalum oxide (TaCZ) nanoparticle CT contrast agent with that of a conventional iodinated contrast agent in a swine model meant to simulate overweight and obese patients. Materials and Methods Four swine were evaluated inside three different-sized adipose-equivalent encasements emulating abdominal girths of 102, 119, and 137 cm. Imaging was performed with a 64-detector row CT scanner at six scan delays after intravenous injection of 240 mg element (Ta or I) per kilogram of body weight of TaCZ or iopromide. For each time point, contrast enhancement of the aorta and liver were measured by using regions of interest. Two readers independently recorded the clarity of vasculature using a five-point Likert scale. Findings were compared by using paired t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results Mean peak enhancement was higher for TaCZ than for iopromide in the aorta (270 HU [σ = 24.5] vs 199 HU [σ = 10.2], P < .001) and liver (61.3 HU [σ = 11.7] vs 45.2 HU [σ = 8], P < .001). Vascular clarity was higher for TaCZ than for iopromide in 63% (132 of 208), 82% (170 of 208), and 86% (178 of 208) of the individual vessels at the 102-, 119-, and 137-cm girths, respectively (P < .01). Arterial clarity scores were higher for TaCZ than for iopromide in 62% (208 of 336) of vessels. Venous clarity scores were higher for TaCZ than for iopromide in 89% (128 of 144) of the veins in the venous phase and in 100% (144 of 144) of veins in the delayed phase (P < .01). No vessel showed higher clarity score with iopromide than with TaCZ. Conclusion An experimental tantalum nanoparticle-based contrast agent showed greater contrast enhancement compared with iopromide in swine models meant to simulate overweight and obese patients. © RSNA, 2018.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast MediaDisease Models, AnimalFemaleInjections, IntravenousNanoparticlesObesityOverweightOxidesSwineTantalumTomography, X-Ray ComputedWaist CircumferenceContrast MediaOxidesTantalumtantalum oxide

Identifiers

PMID29969071
PMCPMC6166772
OpenAlexW2811461507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.