Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29969056›Full record

ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2018

Agitation Modules: Flexible Means to Accelerate Automated Freeze Substitution.

Siegfried Reipert, Helmuth Goldammer, Christine Richardson, Martin W Goldberg, Timothy J Hawkins, Elena Hollergschwandtner, Walter A Kaufmann, Sebastian Antreich, York-Dieter Stierhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siegfried ReipertCore Facility Cell Imaging and Ultrastructure Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Helmuth GoldammerCore Facility Cell Imaging and Ultrastructure Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christine RichardsonDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2622-2261
Martin W GoldbergDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Timothy J HawkinsDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Elena HollergschwandtnerCore Facility Cell Imaging and Ultrastructure Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Walter A KaufmannElectron Microscopy Facility, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Sebastian AntreichCore Facility Cell Imaging and Ultrastructure Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
York-Dieter StierhofCenter for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), Microscopy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E015735/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G011818/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For ultrafast fixation of biological samples to avoid artifacts, high-pressure freezing (HPF) followed by freeze substitution (FS) is preferred over chemical fixation at room temperature. After HPF, samples are maintained at low temperature during dehydration and fixation, while avoiding damaging recrystallization. This is a notoriously slow process. McDonald and Webb demonstrated, in 2011, that sample agitation during FS dramatically reduces the necessary time. Then, in 2015, we (H.G. and S.R.) introduced an agitation module into the cryochamber of an automated FS unit and demonstrated that the preparation of algae could be shortened from days to a couple of hours. We argued that variability in the processing, reproducibility, and safety issues are better addressed using automated FS units. For dissemination, we started low-cost manufacturing of agitation modules for two of the most widely used FS units, the Automatic Freeze Substitution Systems, AFS(1) and AFS2, from Leica Microsystems, using three dimensional (3D)-printing of the major components. To test them, several labs independently used the modules on a wide variety of specimens that had previously been processed by manual agitation, or without agitation. We demonstrate that automated processing with sample agitation saves time, increases flexibility with respect to sample requirements and protocols, and produces data of at least as good quality as other approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsisCaenorhabditis elegansCerebellumChlorellaEquipment DesignFreeze SubstitutionFreezingMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionPressurePrinting, Three-DimensionalTime Factorscryofixationhigh-pressure freezingrapid freeze substitutiontransmission electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID29969056
PMCPMC6262506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.