Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29968846›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Sex-dependent regulation of social reward by oxytocin: an inverted U hypothesis.

Johnathan M Borland, James K Rilling, Kyle J Frantz, H Elliott Albers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Oxytocin and vasopressin modulation of prisoner's dilemma strategies.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Trial
  6. Kinetics of oxytocin effects on amygdala and striatal reactivity vary between women and men.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johnathan M BorlandCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
James K RillingCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kyle J FrantzCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
H Elliott AlbersCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. biohea@gsu.edu.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
Sex Differences in the Social BrainR01MH110212 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERS, H. ELLIOTT, MICHOPOULOS, VASILIKI · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
Neurobiological and Genetic Correlates of Cooperative BehaviorR01MH084068 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI RILLING, JAMES K · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Advances in the Study of Social NeuroendocrinologyR21MH109302 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERS, H. ELLIOTT, HUHMAN, KIM L · 2016 to 2017
$417k
Sex differences in oxytocin modulation of social reward in the mesolimbic dopamine systemF31MH113367 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BORLAND, JOHNATHAN · 2017 to 2018
$76k
NIH HHS P51 OD011132NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH113367NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084068NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110212NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH109302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rewarding properties of social interactions are essential for the expression of social behavior and the development of adaptive social relationships. Here, we review sex differences in social reward, and more specifically, how oxytocin (OT) acts in the mesolimbic dopamine system (MDS) to mediate the rewarding properties of social interactions in a sex-dependent manner. Evidence from rodents and humans suggests that same-sex social interactions may be more rewarding in females than in males. We propose that there is an inverted U relationship between OT dose, social reward, and neural activity within structures of the MDS in both males and females, and that this dose-response relationship is initiated at lower doses in females than males. As a result, depending on the dose of OT administered, OT could reduce social reward in females, while enhancing it in males. Sex differences in the neural mechanisms regulating social reward may contribute to sex differences in the incidence of a large number of psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. This review addresses the potential significance of a sex-dependent inverted U dose-response function for OT's effects on social reward and in the development of gender-specific therapies for these disorders.

Indexed as

RewardSex CharacteristicsSocial BehaviorAnimalsBrainHumansOxytocinOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID29968846
PMCPMC6235847
OpenAlexW2809468983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.