Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29968788›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Examining the utility of the CD64 index compared with other conventional indices for early diagnosis of neonatal infection.

Zongsheng Tang, Daojian Qin, Mingfen Tao, Kun Lv, Shuli Chen, Xiaolong Zhu, Xueqin Li, Tianbing Chen, Mengying Zhang, Min Zhong and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. CD169 and CD64 could help differentiate bacterial from CoVID-19 or other viral infections in the Emergency Department.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021
    Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zongsheng TangCentral Laboratory, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China. tangzongsheng@163.com.
Daojian QinDepartment of Pediatrics, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Mingfen TaoHemopurification Center, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Kun LvCentral Laboratory, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Shuli ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Xiaolong ZhuCentral Laboratory, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Xueqin LiCentral Laboratory, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Tianbing ChenCentral Laboratory, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Mengying ZhangCentral Laboratory, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Min ZhongCentral Laboratory, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Hui YangCentral Laboratory, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Yang XuCentral Laboratory, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China.
Shuanggen MaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241001, Anhui, China. 654385369@qq.com.
Wannan Medical College · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As specific clinical manifestations and detection tools for early neonatal infections are lacking, early detection and treatment are ongoing challenges. The present study aimed to investigate the role and clinical significance of the CD64 index in comparison with conventional examination indices (WBC, PCT and CRP) for the early diagnosis of neonatal infection. Of 74 in-patient newborns, non-sepsis (non-specific infection but free of sepsis), sepsis and control [newborns with ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn (ABOHDN) but without infection] groups involved 32, 16 and 26 cases, respectively. Peripheral blood WBC, PCT, CRP and CD64 indices were acquired for all groups. The sepsis group showed significantly higher WBC, PCT and CRP levels than the control group. Compared with the non-sepsis group, the sepsis group demonstrated significant increases in PCT but not in WBC or CRP. Compared with the control group, the non-sepsis and sepsis groups had higher CD64 indices. Combined, compared with the WBC, PCT and CRP indices, the CD64 index is unique in its capacity to diagnose neonatal infections early. The CD64 index combined with other conventional indices may lay a basis for the future early diagnosis and effective treatment of neonatal infections.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCalcitoninCase-Control StudiesChinaC-Reactive ProteinEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesInfectionsLeukocyte CountMaleProcalcitoninReceptors, IgGSepsisBiomarkersCalcitoninC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninReceptors, IgG

Identifiers

PMID29968788
PMCPMC6030194
OpenAlexW2810541635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.