ArticleScientific reports2018
Comparison of intestinal bacterial and fungal communities across various xylophagous beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- A chromosomal-level genome assembly of Nadezhdiella cantori (Hope, 1843) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).Scientific data · 2026Article
- Diversity and Metabolic Potential of Gut Bacteria inMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Species Diversity and Community Composition of Macrofungi in the Dongling Mountains, Western Beijing, China.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of fungal and bacterial composition in natural wines and their closest pesticide-treated counterparts.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Three-domain microbial communities in the gut of Pachnoda marginata larvae: A comparative study revealing opposing trends in gut compartments.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- The highly differentiated gut of Pachnoda marginata hosts sequential microbiomes: microbial ecology and potential applications.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Gut microorganisms ofmSystems · 2024Article
- Coconut rhinoceros beetle digestive symbiosis with potential plant cell wall degrading microbes.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Functional similarity, despite taxonomical divergence in the millipede gut microbiota, points to a common trophic strategy.Microbiome · 2024Article
- Marked variations in diversity and functions of gut microbiota between wild and domestic stag beetle Dorcus Hopei Hopei.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Bacterial community profiling and identification of bacteria with lignin-degrading potential in different gut segments of African palm weevil larvae (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Soil and seed both influence bacterial diversity in the microbiome of theFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Antibiotic Resistance Profiling and Phylogenicity of Uropathogenic Bacteria Isolated from Patients with Urinary Tract Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Does Host Plant Drive Variation in Microbial Gut Communities in a Recently Shifted Pest?Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Comparison of gut bacterial communities ofBiodiversity data journal · 2023Article
- Does diet breadth affect the complexity of the phytophagous insect microbiota? The case study of Chrysomelidae.Environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Gut Lignocellulose Activity and Microbiota in Asian Longhorned Beetle and Their Predicted Contribution to Larval Nutrition.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing and Its Impacts on Entomological Research in Ecology and Evolution.Neotropical entomology · 2021Review
- Dietary Effects on Biological Parameters and Gut Microbiota ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The microbial gut communities associated with various xylophagous beetles offer great potential for different biotechnologies and elaboration of novel pest management strategies. In this research, the intestinal bacterial and fungal communities of various cerambycid larvae, including Acmaeops septentrionis, Acanthocinus aedilis, Callidium coriaceum, Trichoferus campestris and Chlorophorus herbstii, were investigated. The intestinal microbial communities of these Cerambycidae species were mostly represented by members of the bacterial phyla Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria and the fungal phylum Ascomycota. However, the bacterial and fungal communities varied by beetle species and between individual organisms. Furthermore, bacterial communities' metagenomes reconstruction indicated the genes that encode enzymes involved in the lignocellulose degradation (such as peroxidases, alpha-L-fucosidases, beta-xylosidases, beta-mannosidases, endoglucanases, beta-glucosidases and others) and nitrogen fixation (nitrogenases). Most of the predicted genes potentially related to lignocellulose degradation were enriched in the T. campestris, A. aedilis and A. septentrionis larval gut consortia, whereas predicted genes affiliated with the nitrogenase component proteins were enriched in the T. campestris, A. septentrionis and C. herbstii larval gut consortia. Several bacteria and fungi detected in the current work could be involved in the nutrition of beetle larvae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.