The paradigm shift for drug delivery systems for oral and maxillofacial implants.

Along with the development of nanotechnological strategies for biomaterials associated with the prevention of infections, a myriad of clinically unproven techniques have been described to date. In this work, the aim was to perform a critical analysis of the literature available concerning antibacterial biomaterials for oral implantology and to provide a practical derivation for such a purpose. As anti-adhesive strategies may affect osseointegration, they should no longer be recommended for inclusion in this class of biomaterials, despite promising results in biomedical engineering for other, non-bone load bearing organs. Targeted, antibacterial drug delivery is most likely desirable in the case of intraosseous implants. Interfering factors such as the oral cavity environment, saliva, the bacterial microbiome, as well as, the characteristics of the alveolar mucosa and peri-implant space must be taken into account when calculating the local pharmacokinetics for antibacterial coatings. Effective release is crucial for tailoring antibacterial implant longevity providing minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the desired amount of time, which for oral implants, should be at least the cumulative time for the osseointegration period and functional loading period within the tissues. These parameters may differ between the implant type and its anatomical site. Also, the functional drug concentration in the peri-implant space should be calculated as the amount of the drug released from the implant surface including the concentration of the drug inactivated by biological fluids of the peri-implant space or saliva flow throughout the effective release time.