ArticleKorean circulation journal2018
Gender-related Difference in Clinical Outcome of the Patient with Atrial Fibrillation after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.
Article in Korean circulation journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sex-based disparities in postoperative outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Sex differences in atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: research status and progress.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- Observational
- Sex-related differences in presentation, treatment, and outcomes of Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the prospective APHRS-AF Registry.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Morphological changes in the orifices of the left atrial appendage and left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Post-ablation left atrial function impacts long-term recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation.Heart and vessels · 2022Article
- Gender Difference in Catheter Ablation: Atrial Fibrillations from Mars and Venus?Korean circulation journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPrevious studies provided controversial result about gender differences in the clinical outcome after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). We assessed pure difference after adjustment of referral bias.
methodsThe clinical outcomes including freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence after RFCA were compared between women and men in 1:1 confounding factor matching with age, AF type, periods since diagnosis (±12 months), and procedure era (±12 months). Subgroup analysis was performed in categories defined by AF type and age of 55 (mean menopausal age of Asian women).
resultsTotal 1,875 patients with AF underwent 2,307 RFCA between January 1998 and May 2014 in a single center. Total 367 women (19.6%, 59±10 years) who had undergone first ablation were included. Women had larger left atrial diameter index (26±4 vs. 23±4 mm/m²; p<0.001) and higher peri-procedural complications (9.2% vs. 4.9%; p=0.030) compared to men. The freedom from AF/AT recurrence after RFCA was not different between both groups (71% vs. 76%; log-rank p=0.131, mean follow-up of 55 months). Women with non-paroxysmal AF (PAF) had significantly worse outcome (54% vs. 69%; p=0.014), especially in subgroup with age ≤55 (48% vs. 71%; p=0.010). In multivariate analysis, female gender was an independent predictor of recurrence in subgroup with non-PAF and age ≤55 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.539; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.112-5.801; p=0.027).
conclusionsThe clinical outcome after RFCA was not different between both genders regardless of referral bias. However, the gender difference became evident in patients under 55 years with non-PAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.