Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29968338›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2018

Better horizontal transmission of a US non-InDel strain compared with a French InDel strain of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus.

Sarah Gallien, Mathieu Andraud, Angélique Moro, Gérald Lediguerher, Nadège Morin, Phillip C Gauger, Lionel Bigault, Frédéric Paboeuf, Mustapha Berri, Nicolas Rose and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Airborne transmission of common swine viruses.Porcine health management · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah GallienLaboratoire de Ploufragan, ANSES, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, Ploufragan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5634-1360
Mathieu AndraudLaboratoire de Ploufragan, ANSES, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, Ploufragan, France.
Angélique MoroLaboratoire de Ploufragan, ANSES, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, Ploufragan, France.
Gérald LediguerherLaboratoire de Ploufragan, ANSES, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, Ploufragan, France.
Nadège MorinLaboratoire de Ploufragan, ANSES, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, Ploufragan, France.
Phillip C GaugerVeterinary Diagnostic & Production Animal Medicine, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, Iowa.
Lionel BigaultLaboratoire de Ploufragan, ANSES, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, Ploufragan, France.
Frédéric PaboeufLaboratoire de Ploufragan, ANSES, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, Ploufragan, France.
Mustapha BerriISP, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours, UMR 1282, Nouzilly, France.
Nicolas RoseLaboratoire de Ploufragan, ANSES, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, Ploufragan, France.
Béatrice GraslandLaboratoire de Ploufragan, ANSES, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, Ploufragan, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du TravailINAPORCInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the severe porcine epidemic diarrhoea (PED) epidemics that struck in 2013 in the United States of America and other countries of North and South America, two types of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV) were isolated, namely the InDel and the non-InDel strains. They are differentiated by insertions/deletions in the S1 nucleotide sequence of the S gene, and differences in virulence were observed from the clinical cases. In 2014, a PED outbreak occurred in a pig farm in France, from which an InDel strain was isolated. This study aimed at comparing, under experimental conditions, the pathogenicity and the direct and indirect transmissions between a non-InDel strain isolated from a PED-affected piglet in 2014 in the USA and the French InDel strain. All infected pigs showed clinical signs with the non-InDel strain although only the inoculated and direct contact pigs showed clinical signs in the InDel strain group. Although viral RNA was detected in air samples with both strains, the indirect contact pigs remained free from infection with the InDel strain in contrast to the non-InDel group in which airborne transmission occurred in the indirect contact pigs. All infected pigs shed virus in faeces regardless of PEDV strain with 9 of 30 pigs showing intermittent faecal shedding. The transmission rate by direct contact was found to be 2.17-fold higher than the non-InDel strain compared with the InDel. In conclusion, the InDel strain was less pathogenic than the non-InDel strain in our experimental conditions. The transmission route differed between the two strains. Direct contact was the main transmission route for the InDel strain, although the non-InDel strain was transmitted through direct contact and indirectly through the air.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCoronavirus InfectionsDiarrheaDisease OutbreaksDisease Transmission, InfectiousFarmsFecesFrancePorcine epidemic diarrhea virusRNA, ViralSouth AmericaSwineSwine DiseasesUnited StatesVirulenceRNA, ViralepidemiologyInDel strainnon-InDel strainpathologyporcine epidemic diarrhoea virustransmission

Identifiers

PMID29968338
PMCPMC7169779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.