ArticleThe Journal of pathology2018
Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas.
Article in The Journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge-guided learning with curated prior genetic biomarkers for robust model interpretation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Immune subtyping of colorectal adenoma identifies a subtype with activated adaptive immunity ahead of progressing to cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The Oncology Research Information Exchange Network (ORIEN) - Building a Real-World Collaborative, Patient-driven Infrastructure for Discovery Research and Precision Oncology.Research square · 2026Article
- NetG2P: Network-based genotype-to-phenotype transformation identifies key signaling crosstalk for prognosis in pan-cancer study.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Adaptive immune responses associated with the progression of premalignant lesions to colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Focal Adhesion Kinase Intersects With the BRD4-MYC Axis and YAP1 to Drive Tumor Cell Growth, Phenotypic Plasticity, Stemness, and Metastatic Potential in Colorectal Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Insight into the role of DNA methylation in prognosis and treatment response prediction of gastrointestinal cancers.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Non-Coding RNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Colorectal Polyps and Cancer Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- From Subtypes to Solutions: Integrating CMS Classification with Precision Therapeutics in Colorectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Gut microbial subtypes and clinicopathological value for colorectal cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Review
- Microsatellite instability in mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer: clinical features and underlying molecular mechanisms.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- Developing a comprehensive molecular subgrouping model for cervical cancer using machine learning.American journal of cancer research · 2024Article
- Non-coding RNAs in Precursor Lesions of Colorectal Cancer: Their Role in Cancer Initiation and Formation.Current molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Host Transcriptional Regulatory Genes and Microbiome Networks Crosstalk through Immune Receptors Establishing Normal and Tumor Multiomics Metafirm of the Oral-Gut-Lung Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Classification of tumor types using XGBoost machine learning model: a vector space transformation of genomic alterations.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Transcription factor expression repertoire basis for epigenetic and transcriptional subtypes of colorectal cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Principles of Molecular Utility for CMS Classification in Colorectal Cancer Management.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consensus molecular subtyping is an RNA expression-based classification system for colorectal cancer (CRC). Genomic alterations accumulate during CRC pathogenesis, including the premalignant adenoma stage, leading to changes in RNA expression. Only a minority of adenomas progress to malignancies, a transition that is associated with specific DNA copy number aberrations or microsatellite instability (MSI). We aimed to investigate whether colorectal adenomas can already be stratified into consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classes, and whether specific CMS classes are related to the presence of specific DNA copy number aberrations associated with progression to malignancy. RNA sequencing was performed on 62 adenomas and 59 CRCs. MSI status was determined with polymerase chain reaction-based methodology. DNA copy number was assessed by low-coverage DNA sequencing (n = 30) or array-comparative genomic hybridisation (n = 32). Adenomas were classified into CMS classes together with CRCs from the study cohort and from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 556), by use of the established CMS classifier. As a result, 54 of 62 (87%) adenomas were classified according to the CMS. The CMS3 'metabolic subtype', which was least common among CRCs, was most prevalent among adenomas (n = 45; 73%). One of the two adenomas showing MSI was classified as CMS1 (2%), the 'MSI immune' subtype. Eight adenomas (13%) were classified as the 'canonical' CMS2. No adenomas were classified as the 'mesenchymal' CMS4, consistent with the fact that adenomas lack invasion-associated stroma. The distribution of the CMS classes among adenomas was confirmed in an independent series. CMS3 was enriched with adenomas at low risk of progressing to CRC, whereas relatively more high-risk adenomas were observed in CMS2. We conclude that adenomas can be stratified into the CMS classes. Considering that CMS1 and CMS2 expression signatures may mark adenomas at increased risk of progression, the distribution of the CMS classes among adenomas is consistent with the proportion of adenomas expected to progress to CRC. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.