Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29968252›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2018

Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas.

Malgorzata A Komor, Linda Jw Bosch, Gergana Bounova, Anne S Bolijn, Pien M Delis-van Diemen, Christian Rausch, Youri Hoogstrate, Andrew P Stubbs, Mark de Jong, Guido Jenster and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Transcription factor expression repertoire basis for epigenetic and transcriptional subtypes of colorectal cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Malgorzata A KomorTranslational Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-1639
Linda Jw BoschTranslational Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gergana BounovaDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne S BolijnTranslational Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pien M Delis-van DiemenTranslational Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian RauschTranslational Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Youri HoogstrateDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew P StubbsDepartment of Bioinformatics, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark de JongGenomeScan, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Guido JensterDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole Ct van GriekenDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Beatriz CarvalhoTranslational Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lodewyk Fa WesselsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Connie R JimenezOncoproteomics Laboratory, Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Remond Ja FijnemanTranslational Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2076-5521
Gerrit A MeijerTranslational Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
NGS-ProToCol Consortium:
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLErasmus MC · NLGenomeScan (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consensus molecular subtyping is an RNA expression-based classification system for colorectal cancer (CRC). Genomic alterations accumulate during CRC pathogenesis, including the premalignant adenoma stage, leading to changes in RNA expression. Only a minority of adenomas progress to malignancies, a transition that is associated with specific DNA copy number aberrations or microsatellite instability (MSI). We aimed to investigate whether colorectal adenomas can already be stratified into consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classes, and whether specific CMS classes are related to the presence of specific DNA copy number aberrations associated with progression to malignancy. RNA sequencing was performed on 62 adenomas and 59 CRCs. MSI status was determined with polymerase chain reaction-based methodology. DNA copy number was assessed by low-coverage DNA sequencing (n = 30) or array-comparative genomic hybridisation (n = 32). Adenomas were classified into CMS classes together with CRCs from the study cohort and from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 556), by use of the established CMS classifier. As a result, 54 of 62 (87%) adenomas were classified according to the CMS. The CMS3 'metabolic subtype', which was least common among CRCs, was most prevalent among adenomas (n = 45; 73%). One of the two adenomas showing MSI was classified as CMS1 (2%), the 'MSI immune' subtype. Eight adenomas (13%) were classified as the 'canonical' CMS2. No adenomas were classified as the 'mesenchymal' CMS4, consistent with the fact that adenomas lack invasion-associated stroma. The distribution of the CMS classes among adenomas was confirmed in an independent series. CMS3 was enriched with adenomas at low risk of progressing to CRC, whereas relatively more high-risk adenomas were observed in CMS2. We conclude that adenomas can be stratified into the CMS classes. Considering that CMS1 and CMS2 expression signatures may mark adenomas at increased risk of progression, the distribution of the CMS classes among adenomas is consistent with the proportion of adenomas expected to progress to CRC. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGene DosageMicrosatellite InstabilityAdenomaBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCell DifferentiationColorectal NeoplasmsConsensusDisease ProgressionGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeoplasm StagingPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, Tumoradenomacoloncolorectal cancerneoplasiarectum

Identifiers

PMID29968252
PMCPMC6221003
OpenAlexW2809907085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.