SynthesisHeart failure reviews2018
Prognostic value of T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Heart failure reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of non-contrast myocardial T1 mapping in cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Dapagliflozin effect on pericardial fat deposition: lessons from the DAPA EAT.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Utility of Cardiac CT for Cardiomyopathy Phenotyping.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
- Clinical Significance of Extracellular Volume of Myocardium (ECV) Assessed by Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative Assessment of CMR-Determined Extracellular Volume Metrics in Predicting Adverse Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in β-thalassemia major: beyond T2.La Radiologia medica · 2024Review
- Potential prognostic impact of left-ventricular global longitudinal strain in analysis of whole-heart myocardial mechanics in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Left ventricular entropy is a novel predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with coronary atherosclerosis: a multi-center study.European radiology · 2024Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Myocarditis Compared With Classical Myocarditis.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Evaluation of left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy in patients with hypertension by four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study.European radiology · 2023Article
- Multicenter research priorities in pediatric CMR: results of a collaborative wiki survey.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Reveals Important Association of Fluid Status and TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Observational
- Extracellular volume and left ventricular hypertrophy by cardiac magnetic resonance are independent predictors of cardiovascular outcome in obesity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Myocardial fibrosis and arrhythmic burden in systemic sclerosis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Machine learning phenotyping of scarred myocardium from cine in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2022Article
- Myocardial fibrosis in congenital heart disease.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Prognostic importance of acute phase extracellular volume evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for patients with acute myocardial infarction.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Native T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction for differentiation of myocardial diseases from normal CMR controls in routine clinical practice.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- CMR TEuropean radiology · 2021Article
- Novel Approaches in Cardiac Imaging for Non-invasive Assessment of Left Heart Myocardial Fibrosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) fraction are useful new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to evaluate myocardial fibrosis; however, their prognostic value has not been well described. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the prognostic value of these techniques is performed in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Meta-Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies that utilized T1 mapping and ECV and that also had ≥ 12 months of follow-up data. The primary endpoints included were cardiovascular death and non-fatal cardiac events (heart failure, acute coronary syndrome). Six studies involving a total of 1524 patients and a mean follow-up of 26.3 months were included. Patients had a mean age of 57.6 years and 56.5% were male. Summary effect estimates were generated with fixed/random-effects modeling and hazard ratios were assessed. Patients with a higher ECV value had a significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79 [95% CI 1.24 to 2.58; P = 0.09) and combined cardiac events (HR 1.11 [95% CI 1.08-1.15]; P < 0.0001). Patients with higher native T1 values and (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.96 to 1.17]; P = 0.27) and lower post contrast T1 value (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.98-0.99], P < 0.001) overall had no increased risk for cardiovascular events. Comparing with other CMR parameters, ECV has excellent potential prognostic value and can help guide risk stratification of patients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy into high and low risk for adverse cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29968223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.