Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29968204›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2018

Nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine for the treatment of metastatic pancreas cancer: the South Wales experience.

A E Quinton, S H Gwynne, K L Yim

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A E QuintonWales Cancer Research Centre, Cardiff, UK.
S H GwynneSouth West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK.
K L YimVelindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK. yimkl2000@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-2952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis of pancreatic cancer remains very poor, with a 5-year survival rate of around 3%. There has been little impact from various chemotherapy regimens on improving outcome for several decades. Gemcitabine has been the mainstay chemotherapy for around two decades with little improvement in overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced disease. However, more recently, there has been a paradigm shift in treatment options for these patients. Reported in 2011, combination therapy with FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, and fluorouracil) showed a long awaited but modest improvement in survival, but is reserved only for a small proportion of very fit patients due to concerns over its toxicities. In 2013, the landmark phase III international study MPACT demonstrated an improvement in OS with the combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (GEMBRAX) for the treatment of patients more akin to the real-world population. In the United Kingdom (UK), it was first made widely available on the National Health Service (NHS) in Wales in September 2014 and only recently received a final positive appraisal by NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence) for England in 2017. In this paper, we present our data on the use of this treatment for patients in South Wales and compare real-life practical experience with the MPACT data and reflecting the impact of this paradigm shift.

Indexed as

AdultAged, 80 and overAlbuminsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPancreatic NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomVenous Thromboembolism130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxelAdvancedChemotherapyGemcitabineNab-paclitaxelPancreasSurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.