ArticleThe patient2018
Oh, the Places We'll Go: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Electronic Health Records.
Article in The patient, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Pooled it
- A Process Related View on the Usage of Electronic Health Records from the Patients' Perspective: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Integrating Patient-Reported Quality Measures in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of the American College of Rheumatology Implementation Guide.Arthritis care & research · 2026Article
- Identifying organization-level features important to patient outcomes in cancer care: qualitative interview results with experts.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- A mixed-methods study comparing clinical and patient-reported perspectives on long COVID: insights from electronic health records and narrative journal entries.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Co-prioritization of mental health recovery outcomes and scales for community mental health centers in Peru.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Enhancing provider adoption of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) through implementation science: insights from two international workshops.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Centering Weight Management Clinical Decision Support in Primary Care on Patients With Obesity and Practitioners: A Proof-Of-Concept Study.Obesity science & practice · 2025Article
- Pharmacist-facilitated Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) monitoring: developing an EHR SmartForm© to monitor side effects of oral oncolytics during routine telehealth encounters.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Patient-reported outcomes used actively in cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment: A mini-review of the Danish landscape.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Leveraging the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Develop the American College of Rheumatology's Toolkit for Implementation of Rheumatoid Arthritis Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Study.Arthritis care & research · 2024Article
- Development of an electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcome-based shared decision-making dashboard in oncology.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- The development of a new oral health patient reported outcome measure: the New South Wales public dental services approach.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice-a qualitative post-implementation study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Citizens' Options When Accessing and Sharing Health Information - An International Survey of IMIA Member Countries.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Article
- Patient Experiences Completing Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Behavioral Health Within a Health Safety-Net Setting.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- Feasibility of a 2-Part Substance Use Screener Self-Administered by Patients on Paper: Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Axial Spondyloarthritis Treatment Recommendations and Disease Activity Monitoring in Clinical Practice: Results of an Online Survey.The Journal of rheumatology · 2024Article
- Seamless Integration of Computer-Adaptive Patient Reported Outcomes into an Electronic Health Record.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) presents an unprecedented opportunity to improve health care for patients and populations. The integration of PROs into EHRs can promote patient-centered care and advance quality improvement initiatives, research, and population health. Despite these potential benefits, there are few best practices to help organizations achieve integration. To integrate PROs into EHRs, organizations should evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches within three themes: Planning, Selection, and Engagement. Planning considerations for integration include what strategy will be used, how the integrated system will be governed, ethical and legal issues, and how data from multiple EHRs can be pooled across organizations. Selection considerations involve identifying which patient population to target for PRO data collection on the basis of the intended use of the data in the health care system, and then choosing specific outcomes and their measures. Engagement considerations include how, where, and with what frequency patients will respond to PRO measures, how to display PRO data in EHRs, how clinical teams will act upon PRO data, and how to train, support and incent clinical teams and patients to incorporate PRO data into care. There is no most effective model that will work in all contexts. Organizations wishing to integrate PROs and EHRs should assemble the multidisciplinary expertise needed to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the various approaches for their particular context. We specifically recommend that organizations think carefully about stakeholder participation; design their system with data sharing in mind; develop a framework to aid in PRO selection; create guidelines to support PRO interpretation and action for patients and clinicians; and ensure patients have access to their own PRO data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.