Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29968118›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2018

Clinical Interest and Economic Impact of Preoperative SMS Reminders before Ambulatory Surgery: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Fanny Garnier, Didier Sciard, Florence Marchand-Maillet, Alexandre Theissen, Damir Mohamed, Corinne Alberti, Marc Beaussier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mobile Application's Effect on Patient Satisfaction and Compliance in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Surgery remember@: an innovation to reduce surgical cancellations.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fanny GarnierDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the Ambulatory Surgery Unit, St-Antoine University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ, Paris 6, France.
Didier SciardAmbulatory Surgical Unit and Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
Florence Marchand-MailletDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the Ambulatory Surgery Unit, St-Antoine University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ, Paris 6, France.
Alexandre TheissenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Ambulatory Care Center, Princess Grace Hospital, Pasteur Avenue, Monaco Principality, Monaco.
Damir MohamedUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, CHU Robert Debré, University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, CIC-EC 1426 and, UMR-S 1123 ECEVE, 75019, Paris, France.
Corinne AlbertiUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, CHU Robert Debré, University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, CIC-EC 1426 and, UMR-S 1123 ECEVE, 75019, Paris, France.
Marc BeaussierAmbulatory Surgical Unit and Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France. marc.beaussier@imm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5304-6542
Délégation Paris 7 · FRInstitute Mutualiste Montsouris · FRSorbonne Université · FRPrincess Grace Hospital Centre · MC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient contact by telephone the day before ambulatory surgery is considered as a best practice. The Short Message Service (SMS) could be a suitable alternative. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the interest of preoperative instruction (PI) reminders by SMS compared to telephone calls. This was a prospective single center before-and-after study. Patients scheduled in ambulatory surgery were included during 2 consecutive periods of 10 weeks. The "Call" group received a telephone call for preoperative instructions (PI) and the "SMS" group received an automated protocol SMS reminder. The primary endpoint was patient compliance with PI and time of convocation. The two populations were compared with a non-inferiority hypothesis and the impact of the contact modality on compliance with the PI was assessed using a propensity score. The analysis concerned 301 patients in the Call group and 298 in the SMS group. The absence of dysfunction was observed in 75% of patients in the SMS group compared with 61% in the Call group (Risk difference: 14% [95%CI: 7-21]). The use of SMS was associated with a significant improvement in compliance with the PI (Odds ratio: 1.90 [1.48-2.42]; p < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction was similar regardless of the method of PI reminders. The automation of preoperative SMS reminders is associated with a better respect of the PI compared to the conventional calling method. This PI reminder method satisfies the majority of patients and may have a favorable financial impact.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresPatient CompliancePropensity ScoreReminder SystemsText MessagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppointments and SchedulesCell PhoneFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAmbulatory surgeryHealth economicOrganizationalShort message service (SMS)

Identifiers

PMID29968118
OpenAlexW2811457747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.