Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29968101›Full record

GuidelineZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2018

[S2e guideline: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying drugs].

C Fiehn, J Holle, C Iking-Konert, J Leipe, C Weseloh, M Frerix, R Alten, F Behrens, C Baerwald, J Braun and 23 more

Abstract readReviewPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

C FiehnDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland. c.fiehn@rheuma-badenbaden.de.
J HolleDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
C Iking-KonertDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
J LeipeDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
C WeselohDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
M FrerixDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
R AltenDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
F BehrensDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
C BaerwaldDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
J BraunDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
H BurkhardtDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
G BurmesterDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
J DetertDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
M GaubitzDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
A GauseDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
E Gromnica-IhleDeutsche Rheuma-Liga Bundesverband e. V., Bonn, Deutschland.
H KellnerDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
A KrauseDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
J KuipersDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
H-M LorenzDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
U Müller-LadnerDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
M NothackerArbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e.V. (AWMF), Berlin, Deutschland.
H NüssleinDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
A Rubbert-RothDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
M SchneiderDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
H Schulze-KoopsDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
S SeitzDeutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie e. V. (DGOOC) und Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädische Rheumatologie (DGORh), Hamburg, Deutschland.
H SitterArbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e.V. (AWMF), Berlin, Deutschland.
C SpeckerDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
H-P TonyDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
S WassenbergDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
J WollenhauptDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.
K KrügerDeutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication-based strategies to treat rheumatoid arthritis are crucial in terms of outcome. They aim at preventing joint destruction, loss of function and disability by early and consistent inhibition of inflammatory processes.

objectiveAchieving consensus about evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in Germany.

methodsFollowing a systematic literature research, a structured process among expert rheumatologists was used to reach consensus.

resultsThe results of the consensus process can be summed up in 6 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. There are several new issues compared to the version of 2012, such as differentiated adjustments to the therapeutic regime according to time point and extent of treatment response, the therapeutic goal of achieving remission as assessed by means of the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) as well as the potential use of targeted synthetic DMARDs (JAK inhibitors) and suggestions for a deescalating in case of achieving a sustained remission. Methotrexate still plays the central role at the beginning of the treatment and as a combination partner in the further treatment course. When treatment response to methotrexate is inadequate, either switching to or combining with another conventional synthetic DMARD is an option in the absence of unfavourable prognostic factors. Otherwise biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs are recommended according to the algorithm. Rules for deescalating treatment with glucocorticoids and-where applicable-DMARDs give support for the management of patients who have reached a sustained remission. DISCUSSION: The new guidelines set up recommendations for RA treatment in accordance with the treat-to-target principle. Modern disease-modifying drugs, now including also JAK inhibitors, are available in an algorithm.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidGermanyGlucocorticoidsHumansMethotrexateAntirheumatic AgentsGlucocorticoidsMethotrexateConsensusDMARDEvidenceGuidelineRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.