ArticleJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2016
Much Ado About the New Definitions of Sepsis.
Article in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticoagulant Therapy in Sepsis. The Importance of Timing.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2017Review
- Review
- Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2016Article
- Staphylococcal Scalded Skin Syndrome in Child. A Case Report and a Review from Literature.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2016Article
- A Fatal Case of Community AcquiredJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the publication of the new definition of sepsis (Sepsis-3), a plethora of articles have been published in medical journals. Recognizing the epidemiological importance of the previous definitions, first issued in 1992 (Sepsis-1), and subsequently revised in 2001 (Sepsis-2), the most recent opinion emphasizes the failure "to provide adequate groups of patients with homogenous aetiologies, presentations and outcomes", and blamed one of the causes "for the failure of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), that tested the efficacy of adjuvant sepsis therapies". This review summarizes the recent advances in sepsis definition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.