ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2018
Novel Features and Considerations for ERA and Regulation of Crops Produced by Genome Editing.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome editing for vegetable crop improvement: Challenges and future prospects.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Environmental Applications of GM Microorganisms: Tiny Critters Posing Huge Challenges for Risk Assessment and Governance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Breast cancer prediction based on gene expression data using interpretable machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- An AI-driven framework for enhancing regulatory precision and efficiency in CRISPR-Cas gene-edited crops: challenges, opportunities, and global harmonization.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Review
- Advancements in genome editing tools for genetic studies and crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Regulatory landscape for new breeding techniques (NBTs): insights from Paraguay.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Putting CRISPR-Cas system in action: a golden window for efficient and precise genome editing for crop improvement.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- 3Bs of CRISPR-Cas mediated genome editing in plants: exploring the basics, bioinformatics and biosafety landscape.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023Review
- The economics and policy of genome editing in crop improvement.The plant genome · 2023Review
- CRISPR-Cas engineering in food science and sustainable agriculture: recent advancements and applications.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2023Review
- CRISPR/Cas9: an advanced platform for root and tuber crops improvement.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- GMOs or non-GMOs? The CRISPR Conundrum.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Review
- The Promising Nanovectors for Gene Delivery in Plant Genome Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Genomic Editing: The Evolution in Regulatory Management Accompanying Scientific Progress.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Implications and Lessons From the Introduction of Genome-Edited Food Products in Japan.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
- An Outlook on Global Regulatory Landscape for Genome-Edited Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Novel and emerging biotechnological crop protection approaches.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing describes a variety of molecular biology applications enabling targeted and precise alterations of the genomes of plants, animals and microorganisms. These rapidly developing techniques are likely to revolutionize the breeding of new crop varieties. Since genome editing can lead to the development of plants that could also have come into existence naturally or by conventional breeding techniques, there are strong arguments that these cases should not be classified as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and be regulated no differently from conventionally bred crops. If a specific regulation would be regarded necessary, the application of genome editing for crop development may challenge risk assessment and post-market monitoring. In the session "Plant genome editing-any novel features to consider for ERA and regulation?" held at the 14th ISBGMO, scientists from various disciplines as well as regulators, risk assessors and potential users of the new technologies were brought together for a knowledge-based discussion to identify knowledge gaps and analyze scenarios for the introduction of genome-edited crops into the environment. It was aimed to enable an open exchange forum on the regulatory approaches, ethical aspects and decision-making considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.