Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29967689›Full record

ArticleSignal transduction and targeted therapy

The independence of and associations among apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis.

Qi Chen, Jian Kang, Caiyun Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Signal transduction and targeted therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ambiguous Role of p53 in Transcription-Dependent Tumor Cell Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qi Chen1College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018 China.
Jian Kang3Cancer Signalling Laboratory, Oncogenic Signalling and Growth Control Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan street, Melbourne, VIC 3000 Australia.
Caiyun Fu1College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell death is an essential biological process for physiological growth and development. Three classical forms of cell death-apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis-display distinct morphological features by activating specific signaling pathways. With recent research advances, we have started to appreciate that these cell death processes can cross-talk through interconnecting, even overlapping, signaling pathways, and the final cell fate is the result of the interplay of different cell death programs. This review provides an insight into the independence of and associations among these three types of cell death and explores the significance of cell death under the specific conditions of human diseases, particularly neurodegenerative diseases and cancer.

Identifiers

PMID29967689
PMCPMC6026494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.