ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2018
Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmias.
Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
106 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 239 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of cardiac sympathetic denervation for ventricular arrhythmias: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025Pooled it
- Magnetocardiography in the Evaluation of Sudden Cardiac Death Risk: A Systematic Review.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2024Pooled it
- Genome-Wide Interaction Analyses of Serum Calcium on Ventricular Repolarization Time in 125 393 Participants.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of the effects of microlearning and webinars on knowledge and self-efficacy of emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Trial
- The Immune System as a Proarrhythmic Mediator: A Novel Paradigm for the Development of New Antiarrhythmic Therapy.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Improving arrhythmic risk prediction using cardiac magnetic resonance within deep learning in ischemic heart disease.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Article
- Magnesium and Cardiac Arrythmias: An Overlooked Guardian of Electrical Stability.Cardiology research · 2026Review
- Dental drugs with proarrhythmic risk in patients with Brugada syndrome: precaution instructions for practices in the field of orofacial pain.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A novel methodology to characterize beat-to-beat alternations in whole-cell calcium currents.PloS one · 2026Article
- UK Resuscitation Advanced Life Support Guidelines: Should the Paradigm be Extended?Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- High frame rate speckle tracking echocardiography to image the left ventricular mechanical activation sequence in healthy participants and patients with left bundle branch block.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- National Trends in Arrhythmias and Heart Failure Related Mortality in the United States From 1999 to 2023: A CDC Wonder Analysis.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Advances in Conductive Nanomaterials for Cardiac Arrhythmia and Future Directions in Bioevaluation Strategies.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Association of ventricular tachycardia burden with 30-day in-hospital mortality in an intensive care unit cohort.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of an implantable cardiac defibrillator compared with pharmaceutical therapy in patients hospitalized with arrhythmia in Iran.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2025Article
- The Role of Mechanical Economy and Efficiency as Key Drivers of Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Performance Improvement in a Patient With Heart Failure and an Implanted CRT-D: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Temporary Pacing for Electric Cardiac Stimulation and Neuromodulatory Cardiovascular Therapy.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2025Review
- Article
- Cardiovascular Etiologies and Risk Factors of Survival Outcomes After Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Data From the KoCARC Registry.Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
- Cost-Utility Analysis of LifeVest® in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients at Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in England.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) and arrhythmia represent a major worldwide public health problem, accounting for 15-20 % of all deaths. Early resuscitation and defibrillation remains the key to survival, yet its implementation and the access to public defibrillators remains poor, resulting in overall poor survival to patients discharged from hospital. Novel approaches employing smart technology may provide the solution to this dilemma. Though the majority of cases are attributable to coronary artery disease, a thorough search for an underlying cause in cases where the diagnosis is unclear is necessary. This enables better management of arrhythmia recurrence and screening of family members. The majority of cases of SCD occur in patients who do not have traditional risk factors for arrhythmia. New and improved large scale screening tools are required to better predict risk in the wider population who represent the majority of cases of SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.