Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29967641›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2018

Prognostic Value of MUC2 Expression in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chao Li, Didi Zuo, Libin Yin, Yuyang Lin, Chenguang Li, Tao Liu, Lei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mutational Landscape of Bladder Cancer in Mexican Patients:International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Role of gut microbiota and bacterial metabolites in mucins of colorectal cancer.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chao LiDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2857-5714
Didi ZuoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Libin YinDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yuyang LinDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Chenguang LiDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Tao LiuDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-7469
Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reliability of MUC2 as a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. This study evaluated the association between MUC2 expression levels in CRC tissues and prognosis.

methodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), Wanfang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched to identify studies exploring the relationship between MUC2 expression in CRC tissues and overall survival (OS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the associations between MUC2 expression levels and prognosis and MUC2 expression levels and CRC clinicopathological characteristics, respectively.

resultsThe meta-analysis included 11 studies (2619 patients). Low MUC2 expression level was significantly associated with poor OS (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.43-1.94;

conclusionThe low levels of MUC2 in CRC tissues are poor prognostic factor independent of stage or other well-recognized markers of later-stage disease. Large well-designed cohort studies are required to validate MUC2 as a biomarker for poor prognosis in CRC.

Identifiers

PMID29967641
PMCPMC6008766
OpenAlexW2805608686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.