ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018
Effects of Consecutive Versus Non-consecutive Days of Resistance Training on Strength, Body Composition, and Red Blood Cells.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term creatine supplementation enhances strength, reduces fatigue, and accelerates recovery in resistance-trained athletes: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025Trial
- Personalized Exercise Training Modulates Red Blood Cell Rheology and Morphology in Long COVID.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Post-exercise home-based hot-bathing with/without light exercise: effects on physiological adaptations to short-term high-intensity resistance training in healthy young men.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- The effects of bar positioning, stance width, repetition, and load on muscle activity during the barbell back squat.PloS one · 2026Article
- Effect of home-based hot bathing on exercise-induced adaptations associated with short-term resistance exercise training in young men.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Universal Training Precautions: A Review of Evidence and Recommendations for Prevention of Exercise-Related Injury, Illness, and Death in Warfighters and Athletes.Journal of athletic training · 2023Review
- Minimal-Dose Resistance Training for Improving Muscle Mass, Strength, and Function: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Practical Considerations.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Is there Evidence for the Suggestion that Fatigue Accumulates Following Resistance Exercise?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Fatigue, pain, and the recovery of neuromuscular function after consecutive days of full-body resistance exercise in trained men.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Article
- Protocol for Minute Calisthenics: a randomized controlled study of a daily, habit-based, bodyweight resistance training program.BMC public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health authorities worldwide recommend 2-3 days per week of resistance training (RT) performed ∼48-72 h apart. However, the influence of recovery period between RT sessions on muscle strength, body composition, and red blood cells (RBCs) are unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.