Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29967527›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2018

Directed acyclic graphs: a tool for causal studies in paediatrics.

Thomas C Williams, Cathrine C Bach, Niels B Matthiesen, Tine B Henriksen, Luigi Gagliardi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 261 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas C WilliamsEpidemiology Section, European Society for Paediatric Research, Edinburgh, UK.
Cathrine C BachPaediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Niels B MatthiesenPaediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Tine B HenriksenEpidemiology Section, European Society for Paediatric Research, Edinburgh, UK.
Luigi GagliardiEpidemiology Section, European Society for Paediatric Research, Edinburgh, UK. l.gagliardi@neonatalnet.org.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKMRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine · GBRegional Hospital Randers · DK

Funding

Wellcome Trust 204802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many paediatric clinical research studies, whether observational or interventional, have as an eventual aim the identification or quantification of causal relationships. One might ask: does screen time influence childhood obesity? Could overuse of paracetamol in infancy cause wheeze? How does breastfeeding affect later cognitive outcomes? In this review, we present causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to a paediatric audience. DAGs are a graphical tool which provide a way to visually represent and better understand the key concepts of exposure, outcome, causation, confounding, and bias. We use clinical examples, including those outlined above, framed in the language of DAGs, to demonstrate their potential applications. We show how DAGs can be most useful in identifying confounding and sources of bias, demonstrating inappropriate statistical adjustments for presumed biases, and understanding threats to validity in randomised controlled trials. We believe that a familiarity with DAGs, and the concepts underlying them, will be of benefit both to the researchers planning studies, and practising clinicians interpreting them.

Indexed as

CausalityConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicData DisplayData Interpretation, StatisticalResearch DesignAcetaminophenBiasChildHumansLanguageModels, StatisticalPediatricsResearch PersonnelRespiratory SoundsRiskSteroidsAcetaminophenSteroids

Identifiers

PMID29967527
PMCPMC6215481
OpenAlexW2807269292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.