Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29967371›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2018

Prophylactic Intravenous Lidocaine at Different Doses for Fentanyl-Induced Cough (FIC): A Meta-Analysis.

Wulin Tan, Si Li, Xiaochen Liu, Xiang Gao, Wenqi Huang, Junying Guo, Zhongxing Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk Factors for Fentanyl-Induced Cough Following General Anesthesia in Adults: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center in China.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wulin TanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Si LiThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Xiaochen LiuZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Xiang GaoDepartment of Pharmacy, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Wenqi HuangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Junying GuoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China. gjunying@aliyun.com.
Zhongxing WangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China. doctorwzx@126.com.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNSixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate whether different doses of intravenous lidocaine are effective at preventing fentanyl-induced cough (FIC), we searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science, according to predefined criteria, for all articles published until June 2017. A meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed by combining the reported incidence of FIC. The odds ratio (OR) was used as a summary statistic. Eleven articles were included, with 965 patients in the lidocaine group and 745 patients in the control group. A pooled analysis indicated that the overall incidence of FIC was significantly different between the lidocaine group and the control group (OR, 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-0.35; P < 0.05), as well as between the adult and paediatric subgroups. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were stable. Subgroup analyses showed that compared to a placebo, both low (0.5-1.0 mg/kg) and high doses of lidocaine (1.5-2.0 mg/kg) were effective at reducing FIC incidence. There was no significant difference between low or high doses of lidocaine. Fentanyl doses added no significant heterogeneity as shown by meta-regression. The findings of this meta-analysis indicate that prophylactic intravenous lidocaine is effective at preventing FIC in both adults and children.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultChildCoughFentanylHumansLidocaineTreatment OutcomeFentanylLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID29967371
PMCPMC6028622
OpenAlexW2810475639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.