Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29967306›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

The impact of the built environment on health behaviours and disease transmission in social systems.

Noa Pinter-Wollman, Andrea Jelić, Nancy M Wells

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Associations Between the Built Environment and Adult Obesity and the Mediating Role of Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Incorporating Social Determinants of Health in Infectious Disease Models: A Systematic Review of Guidelines.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Noa Pinter-WollmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA nmpinter@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0448-8037
Andrea JelićDepartment of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Nancy M WellsDepartment of Design and Environmental Analysis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Aalborg University · DKCornell University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Modeling how keystone individuals emerge and influence disease transmissionR01GM115509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PINTER-WOLLMAN, NOA MICHAL · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environment plays an important role in disease dynamics and in determining the health of individuals. Specifically, the built environment has a large impact on the prevention and containment of both chronic and infectious disease in humans and in non-human animals. The effects of the built environment on health can be direct, for example, by influencing environmental quality, or indirect by influencing behaviours that impact disease transmission and health. Furthermore, these impacts can happen at many scales, from the individual to the society, and from the design of the plates we eat from to the design of cities. In this paper, we review the ways that the built environment affects both the prevention and the containment of chronic and infectious disease. We bring examples from both human and animal societies and attempt to identify parallels and gaps between the study of humans and animals that can be capitalized on to advance the scope and perspective of research in each respective field. By consolidating this literature, we hope to highlight the importance of built structures in determining the complex dynamics of disease and in impacting the health behaviours of both humans and animals.This article is part of the theme issue 'Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour'.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentChronic DiseaseDisease Transmission, InfectiousHealth BehaviorAnimalsArchitectureHumansNesting BehaviorSocial Behaviorarchitecturechronic diseasecontainmentinfectious diseaseprevention

Identifiers

PMID29967306
PMCPMC6030577
OpenAlexW2810591140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.