Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29967301›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Exploring nest structures of acorn dwelling ants with X-ray microtomography and surface-based three-dimensional visibility graph analysis.

Tasos Varoudis, Abigail G Swenson, Scott D Kirkton, James S Waters

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Survey of the Landscape Visibility Analysis Tools and Technical Improvements.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tasos VaroudisBartlett School of Architecture, University College London (UCL), 22 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0QB, UK t.varoudis@ucl.ac.uk.
Abigail G SwensonDepartment of Biology, Providence College Providence, 1 Cunningham Square, Providence, RI 02918, USA.
Scott D KirktonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Union College, 807 Union St, Schenectady, NY 12308, USA.
James S WatersDepartment of Biology, Providence College Providence, 1 Cunningham Square, Providence, RI 02918, USA jwaters2@providence.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7077-9441
Providence College · USUnion College · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical spaces within which organisms live affect their biology and in many cases can be considered part of their extended phenotype. The nests of social insect societies have a fundamental impact on their ability to function as complex superorganisms. Ants in many species excavate elaborate subterranean nests, but others inhabit relatively small pre-formed cavities within rock crevices and hollow seeds.

Indexed as

Nesting BehaviorAnimalsAntsChoice BehaviorDecision MakingEcosystemNutsQuercusX-Ray Microtomographymicrotomographynest architectureTemnothoraxvisibility graph analysisX-rays

Identifiers

PMID29967301
PMCPMC6030587
OpenAlexW2810775949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.