ArticleBalkan medical journal2018
Treatment of Graf Type IIa Hip Dysplasia: A Cut-off Value for Decision Making
Article in Balkan medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ paediatrics open · 2023Pooled it
- Traditional Mongolian swaddling and developmental dysplasia of the hip: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2021Trial
- Clinical Evaluation of an Electronic Guidance System for Optimizing the Ultrasound Screening for Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Newborns.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Universal in-house neonatal hips ultrasonography screening in the United Arab Emirates.Saudi medical journal · 2023Article
- Residual acetabular dysplasia after Pavlik harness treatment for Graf type II hips.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: How Many Risk Factors Are Needed?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diagnosis and Treatment Planning of Developmental Hip Dysplasia: Evaluation of Care Practices of the Members of the Turkish Pediatric Orthopedics Association.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Developmental retardation of femoral head size and femoral head ossification in mild and severe developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants: a preliminary cross-sectional study based on ultrasound images.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Does the COVID-19 pandemic cause late diagnosis and delay in treatment in developmental dysplasia of hip patients?International journal of clinical practice · 2021Article
- The incidence of avascular necrosis following a cohort of treated developmental dysplasia of the hip in a single tertiary centre.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rate of spontaneous normalization in type IIa hips is reported to be high, whereas dysplsia persists or worsens in 5%-10% of cases. Aims: To evaluate the natural course of type IIa hips using Graf’s own perspective of physiological immaturity and maturational deficit. Study Design: A single center, retrospective cohort study. Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with type IIa hip dysplasia at a single institution from 2012 to 2014. All patients included in the study had hip ultrasonography at about 6 weeks and 3 months of age. To assess reliability in α and β angles, ultrasonography measurements were carried out on the same image individually by all observers. The α and β angles were used as the main outcome measurements to evaluate hip maturation at the last follow-up. A receiver operating characteristics curve was drawn at the 3 month ultrasonography to evaluate the cut-off values for α and β angles for persistent dysplasia. Results: Sixty-four patients and 88 affected hips (63% unilateral and 37% bilateral) were included. The mean age at diagnosis was 6.4±2.7 weeks. Fifty-four hips were type IIa(+) (physiologically immature) and 34 hips were type IIa(-) (maturational deficit) at the initial ultrasonography evaluation. Improvement to type I was seen in 52 type IIa(+) and 17 type IIa(-) hips. Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that patients do well if the α angle was >55° (area under the curve: 0.86; p<0.001 for the left hip and area under the curve: 0.72; p=0.008 for the right hip). Conclusion: The cut-off α angle value of 55° on initial ultrasonography should be considered to prevent future dysplasia. An α angle <55° on the initial ultrasonography was an independent predictor of worsening sonographic findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.