ArticleNeuroImage2018
Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.
Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- ERP Decoding Analysis of Visual Working Memory Processes in Schizophrenia.Alpha psychiatry · 2026Article
- Rotation-tolerant representations elucidate the time-course of high-level object processing.PloS one · 2026Article
- Normative data of the Italian Famous Face Test.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Neural mechanisms of face familiarity and learning in the human amygdala and hippocampus.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Mapping the dynamics of visual feature coding: Insights into perception and integration.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Family lexicon: Using language models to encode memories of personally familiar and famous people and places in the brain.PloS one · 2024Article
- EEG Amplitude Modulation Analysis across Mental Tasks: Towards Improved Active BCIs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Sustained neural representations of personally familiar people and places during cued recall.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023Article
- Attention allocation on mobile app interfaces when human interacts with them.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022Article
- The nature of neural object representations during dynamic occlusion.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2022Article
- Synchronised neural signature of creative mental imagery in reality and augmented reality.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Modeling temporal dynamics of face processing in youth and adults.Social neuroscience · 2021Article
- Perceptual difficulty modulates the direction of information flow in familiar face recognition.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Computational insights into human perceptual expertise for familiar and unfamiliar face recognition.Cognition · 2021Article
- The Influence of Object-Color Knowledge on Emerging Object Representations in the Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- An objective, sensitive and ecologically valid neural measure of rapid human individual face recognition.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- How face perception unfolds over time.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Differentiation of Types of Visual Agnosia Using EEG.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans recognize faces with ease, despite the complexity of the task and of the visual system which underlies it. Different spatial regions, including both the core and extended face processing networks, and distinct temporal stages of processing have been implicated in face recognition, but there is ongoing controversy regarding the extent to which the mechanisms for recognizing a familiar face differ from those for an unfamiliar face. Here, we used electroencephalogram (EEG) and flicker SSVEP, a high signal-to-noise approach, and searchlight decoding methods to elucidate the mechanisms mediating the processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the time domain. Familiar and unfamiliar faces were presented periodically at 15 Hz, 6 Hz and 3.75 Hz either upright or inverted in separate blocks, with the rationale that faster frequencies require shorter processing times per image and tap into fundamentally different levels of visual processing. The 15 Hz trials, likely to reflect early visual processing, exhibited enhanced neural responses for familiar over unfamiliar face trials, but only when the faces were upright. In contrast, decoding methods revealed similar classification accuracies for upright and inverted faces for both familiar and unfamiliar faces. For the 6 Hz frequency, familiar faces had lower amplitude responses than unfamiliar faces, and decoding familiarity was more accurate for upright compared with inverted faces. Finally, the 3.75 Hz frequency revealed no main effects of familiarity, but decoding showed significant correlations with behavioral ratings of face familiarity, suggesting that activity evoked by this slow presentation frequency reflected higher-level, cognitive aspects of familiarity processing. This three-way dissociation between frequencies reveals that fundamentally different stages of the visual hierarchy are modulated by face familiarity. The combination of experimental and analytical approaches used here represent a novel method for elucidating spatio-temporal characteristics within the visual system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.