Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29966600›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2018

Geometric classification of brain network dynamics via conic derivative discriminants.

Matthew F Singh, Todd S Braver, ShiNung Ching

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew F SinghDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: f.singh@wustl.edu.
Todd S BraverDepartment of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
ShiNung ChingDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive ControlR37MH066078 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2013 to 2022
$7.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH066078Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade, pattern decoding techniques have granted neuroscientists improved anatomical specificity in mapping neural representations associated with function and cognition. Dynamical patterns are of particular interest, as evidenced by the proliferation and success of frequency domain methods that reveal structured spatiotemporal rhythmic brain activity. One drawback of such approaches, however, is the need to estimate spectral power, which limits the temporal resolution of classification. NEW

methodWe propose an alternative method that enables classification of dynamical patterns with high temporal fidelity. The key feature of the method is a conversion of time-series data into temporal derivatives. By doing so, dynamically-coded information may be revealed in terms of geometric patterns in the phase space of the derivative signal.

resultsWe derive a geometric classifier for this problem which simplifies into a straightforward calculation in terms of covariances. We demonstrate the relative advantages and disadvantages of the technique with simulated data and benchmark its performance with an EEG dataset of covert spatial attention. We reveal the timecourse of covert spatial attention and, by mapping the classifier weights anatomically, its retinotopic organization. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodWe especially highlight the ability of the method to provide strong group-level classification performance compared to existing benchmarks, while providing information that is complementary with classical spectral-based techniques. The robustness and sensitivity of the method to noise is also examined relative to spectral-based techniques.

conclusionThe proposed classification technique enables decoding of dynamic patterns with high temporal resolution, performs favorably to benchmark methods, and facilitates anatomical inference.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBrainBrain MappingData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMachine LearningModels, StatisticalNeural PathwaysNeuronsDirectional statisticsDynamical systemsEEGMachine learningNeural dynamicsPattern classification

Identifiers

PMID29966600
PMCPMC6417100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.