Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29966337›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of

Ionelia Taranu, Daniela Eliza Marin, Cornelia Braicu, Gina Cecilia Pistol, Ionut Sorescu, Lavinia Laura Pruteanu, Ioana Berindan Neagoe, Dan Cristian Vodnar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ionelia TaranuLaboratory of Animal Biology, National Institute for Research and Development for Biology and Animal Nutrition, Calea Bucuresti No. 1, Balotesti, 077015 Ilfov, Romania. ionelia.taranu@ibna.ro.ORCID 0000-0003-0727-5827
Daniela Eliza MarinLaboratory of Animal Biology, National Institute for Research and Development for Biology and Animal Nutrition, Calea Bucuresti No. 1, Balotesti, 077015 Ilfov, Romania. daniela.marin@ibna.ro.
Cornelia BraicuDepartment of Functional Genomics and Experimental Pathology, Research Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Str. V. Babes, No. 8, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. braicucornelia@yahoo.com.
Gina Cecilia PistolLaboratory of Animal Biology, National Institute for Research and Development for Biology and Animal Nutrition, Calea Bucuresti No. 1, Balotesti, 077015 Ilfov, Romania. gina.pistol@ibna.ro.
Ionut SorescuLaboratory of Animal Biology, National Institute for Research and Development for Biology and Animal Nutrition, Calea Bucuresti No. 1, Balotesti, 077015 Ilfov, Romania. ionutsorescu68@gmail.com.
Lavinia Laura PruteanuDepartment of Chemistry, Lensfield Road, Centre for Molecular Science Informatics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK. pruteanulavinia@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-1113
Ioana Berindan NeagoeDepartment of Functional Genomics and Experimental Pathology, Research Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Str. V. Babes, No. 8, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. ioananeagoe29@gmail.com.
Dan Cristian VodnarDepartment of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Manastur, No. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. dan.vodnar@usamvcluj.ro.
National Research Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition · ROIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood and feed supplements containing microorganisms with probiotic potential are of increasing interest due to their healthy promoting effect on human and animals. Their mechanism of action is still unknown. Using a microarray approach, the aim of this study was to investigate the differences in genome-wide gene expression induced by a mixture of three

methodsUndifferentiated IPEC-1 cells seeded at a density of 2.0 × 10⁵/mL in 24-wells culture plates were cultivated at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ until they reached confluence (2⁻3 days). Confluent cells monolayer were then cultivated with 1 mL of fresh lactobacilli (LB) mixture suspension prepared for a concentration of approximately 3.3 × 10⁷ CFU/mL for each strain (1 × 10⁸ CFU/mL in total) for 3 h and analyzed by microarray using Gene Spring GX v.11.5.

resultsThe functional analysis showed that 1811 of the genes modulated by LB treatment are involved in signaling (95% up-regulation, 121 genes with a fold change higher than 10). The most enhanced expression was registered for

conclusionGene overexpression was the predominant effect produced by lactobacilli treatment in IPEC-1 cells, genes related to signaling pathways being the most affected. The protective role of lactobacilli in epithelial barrier function against inflammation and in the activation of immune response was also noticed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineEpithelial CellsIntestinesLactobacillusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSwineTranscriptomegenomeintestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC-1)IPA analysislactobacillimicroarray

Identifiers

PMID29966337
PMCPMC6073849
OpenAlexW2811201620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.