Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29966274›Full record

ArticleInsects2018

Utilization of Quercetin as an Oviposition Stimulant by Lab-Cultured

Eric W Riddick, Zhixin Wu, Fred J Eller, Mark A Berhow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric W RiddickNational Biological Control Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA. eric.riddick@ars.usda.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4795-961X
Zhixin WuNational Biological Control Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA. zhixin.wu@ars.usda.gov.
Fred J EllerFunctional Foods Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Peoria, IL 61604, USA. fred.eller@ars.usda.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-4484-3205
Mark A BerhowFunctional Foods Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Peoria, IL 61604, USA. mark.berhow@ars.usda.gov.
Agricultural Research Service · USNational Sedimentation Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe discovery of natural products to improve the reproductive performance of mass-reared predators is an important aim for successful augmentative biological control. We tested the hypothesis that quercetin (a bioflavonoid) stimulates oviposition by the ladybird beetle

methodsWe conducted bioassays in solitary cages (housing one female) and communal cages (housing 10 females) to estimate daily oviposition site preferences, egg production in response to quercetin in the presence or absence of a tissue paper substrate, and female “resting” positions.

resultsFemales preferentially oviposited within 1⁻2 cm of quercetin powder, held in a tiny dish, at the base of cages. When given a choice, females oviposited in the dish with quercetin over a tissue paper substrate. In one of two experiments, they produced more egg clutches, regardless of oviposition site, when the quercetin and tissue were in close juxtaposition. Females “rested” on the tissue in the presence or absence of quercetin.

conclusionThis study provides evidence that quercetin can be utilized as an oviposition stimulant by

Indexed as

aphidsbioflavonoidsbiological controlCoccinellidaelady beetlepredatorrearingreproduction

Identifiers

PMID29966274
PMCPMC6163289
OpenAlexW2810647030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.