Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29966229›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2018

Effectiveness of Essence of Chicken on Cognitive Function Improvement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Panrapee Suttiwan, Pongsak Yuktanandana, Sakkaphat Ngamake

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Carnosine supplementation improves cognitive outcomes in younger participants of the NEAT trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Panrapee SuttiwanFaculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. cpanrapee@yahoo.com.
Pongsak YuktanandanaFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. ypongsak@gmail.com.
Sakkaphat NgamakeFaculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. nsakkaphat@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5053-6960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality, adequately-powered clinical trials investigating the effect of Essence of Chicken (EC) on cognitive function are lacking. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on healthy adult volunteers to determine the effect of EC on short-term memory, working memory, and selective and sustained attention. As a secondary objective, we evaluated baseline stress as a modifying factor by including treatment, stress and visit as main effects in a three-way ANOVA model. Cognitive function was evaluated at baseline, and Days 7 and 14. Data from 235 participants were analyzed on a per-protocol basis. The three-way interaction effect was significant (

Indexed as

ChickensDietary SupplementsPoultry ProductsAdultAnimalsAttentionCognitionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological TestsSeverity of Illness IndexStress, Psychologicalattentionchicken essencechicken extractcognitive functionessence of chickenhealth-nutritional supplementmemoryshort-term memorystressworking memory

Identifiers

PMID29966229
PMCPMC6073337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.