Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29965952›Full record

Trial reportTransplantation2019

Measurement Characteristics of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation.

John D Peipert, Ron D Hays, Satoru Kawakita, Jennifer L Beaumont, Amy D Waterman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Development and Psychometric Validation of a Knowledge Assessment Tool on Radiotherapy Resistance Among Oncologists in Iraq.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Association of sociocultural factors with initiation of the kidney transplant evaluation process.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John D PeipertDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Ron D HaysDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Satoru KawakitaTerasaki Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Jennifer L BeaumontTerasaki Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Amy D WatermanTerasaki Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

The Center for Health Improvement of Minority ElderlyP30AG021684 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Homero Erwin del Pino · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
TAILORED COMPUTER EDUCATION TO INCREASE LIVING DONATION IN AFRICAN-AMERICANSR01DK088711 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WATERMAN, AMY DOGGETTE · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021684NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKidney transplant is the best treatment for most end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, but proportionally few ESRD patients receive kidney transplant. To make an informed choice about whether to pursue kidney transplant, patients must be knowledgeable of its risks and benefits. To reliably and validly measure ESRD patients' kidney transplant knowledge, rigorously tested measures are required. This article describes the development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation (KART).

methodsWe administered 17 transplant knowledge items to a sample of 1294 ESRD patients. Item characteristics and scale scores were estimated using an Item Response Theory graded response model. Construct validity was tested by examining differences in scale scores between patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving various types of transplant education.

resultsItem Response Theory modeling suggested that 15 items should be retained for the KART. This scale had a marginal reliability of 0.75 and evidenced acceptable reliability (>0.70) across most of its range. Construct validity was supported by the KART's ability to distinguish patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving different types of kidney transplant education, including talking to doctors/medical staff (effect size [ES], 0.61; P < 0.001), reading brochures (ES, 0.45; P < 0.001), browsing the internet (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001), and watching videos (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe final 15-item KART can be used to determine the kidney transplant knowledge levels of ESRD patients and plan appropriate interventions to ensure informed transplant decision making occurs.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeKidney TransplantationAccess to InformationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID29965952
PMCPMC6311148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.