ReviewNeurobiology of learning and memory2020
Cannabinoid agonist administration within the cerebellar cortex impairs motor learning.
Review in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning identification of molecular targets for medulloblastoma subgroups using microarray gene fingerprint analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Effect of Cannabis on Memory Consolidation, Learning and Retrieval and Its Current Legal Status in India: A Review.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Autonomous Purkinje cell activation instructs bidirectional motor learning through evoked dendritic calcium signaling.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Cannabinoids modulate associative cerebellar learning via alterations in behavioral state.eLife · 2020Article
- Intracerebellar cannabinoid administration impairs delay but not trace eyeblink conditioning.Behavioural brain research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Systemic administration of cannabinoid agonists impairs cerebellum-dependent motor learning. The cannabinoid-induced impairment of motor learning has been hypothesized to be due to disruption of Purkinje cell plasticity within the cerebellar cortex. In the current study, we tested this hypothesis in rats with localized microinfusions of cannabinoid agonists and antagonists into the cerebellar cortex during eyeblink conditioning, a type of cerebellum-dependent motor learning. Infusions of the cannabinoid agonists WIN55,212-2 or ACEA directly into the eyeblink conditioning microzone of the cerebellar cortex severely impaired acquisition of eyeblink conditioning, whereas the CB1R antagonist SR141716A did not produce a significant impairment. Infusions of WIN55,212-2 outside of the eyeblink conditioning microzone did not impair motor learning, establishing anatomical specificity for the agonist effects. The motor learning impairment caused by WIN55,212-2 and ACEA was rescued by SR141716A, indicating that the learning deficit was produced through CB1Rs. The current findings demonstrate that the effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on motor learning are localized to CB1Rs within a discrete microzone of the cerebellar cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.