Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29963453›Full record

ArticleEuroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology

Striking Multiple Primary Tumors that underwent Whipple Procedure due to Periampullary Carcinoma: An Analysis of 21 Cases.

Osman N Dilek, Oguzhan Ozsay, Serkan Karaisli, Emine Ö Gür, Ahmet Er, Selda G Haciyanli, Haldun Kar, Fatma H Dilek

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Osman N DilekDepartment of Surgery, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Oguzhan OzsayDepartment of Surgery, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Serkan KaraisliDepartment of Surgery, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Emine Ö GürDepartment of Surgery, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Ahmet ErDepartment of Surgery, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Selda G HaciyanliDepartment of Surgery, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Haldun KarDepartment of Surgery, Izmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Fatma H DilekDepartment of Pathology, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Ataturk Research and Education Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe term multiple primary tumor (MPT) is used to describe cases where two or more primary tumors show no histopathological similarities in between. Multiple primary tumor cases have begun to increase in recent years as a result of the increase in life expectancy because of the increase in life standards and progress in diagnostic methods. In this study, MPT cases with periampullary tumors that underwent Whipple procedure were discussed in the light of literature data. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe patient files of 223 cases with periampullary tumors that underwent Whipple procedure in our hospital during the last 6 years were examined retrospectively. More than one primary tumor was detected in 21 patients.

resultsPeriampullary carcinomas were detected as a second primary tumor in 18 patients. First primary tumor was periampullary carcinoma in 3 patients that underwent Whipple procedure. After the Whipple procedure, 5 patients died due to early complications in the first 30 days and 6 patients died due to metastases and additional problems that developed during follow-up. DISCUSSION: The incidence of MPT has been reported as 0.7 to 14.5% in the literature. Most of them are multiple primary case presentations. In patient management, it is recommended that each tumor should be evaluated independently of its own characteristics, and treatment and follow-up should be planned accordingly.

conclusionThe MPT cases are increasing. The possibility of MPT as well as metastasis should be kept in mind during the evaluation of tumor foci seen during diagnosis and follow-up of patients. The characteristics of each tumor, survival, and prognosis should be evaluated separately and the most appropriate treatment should be offered to the patient. It is recommended that synchronic primary tumors which are considered to be surgically resectable without metastasis should be removed in the same session.

Indexed as

DiagnosisMultiple primary tumorsPancreasTreatmentWhipple procedure.

Identifiers

PMID29963453
PMCPMC6024055
OpenAlexW2806523432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.