Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29963302›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2018

Responsive brain stimulation in epilepsy.

Alendia Hartshorn, Barbara Jobst

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Oxidative Stress in Brain Function.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The role of neuromodulation in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Time-evolving controllability of effective connectivity networks during seizure progression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alendia HartshornDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756-1000, USA.
Barbara JobstGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimulation devices are considered in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and who are not surgical candidates. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a cortically based stimulator activated by electrocorticography (ECoG) patterns. Stimulation is applied directly to the seizure focus. The vagal nerve stimulator AspireSR 106 is also a responsive device which, in addition to basal stimulation, is activated by tachycardia. Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus is used in Europe for intractable epilepsy and yields similar response rates to RNS using duty cycle stimulation. Chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation is an experimental form of constant, low-level stimulation applied to a seizure focus. These modalities are discussed and compared in this review.

Indexed as

deep brain stimulationepilepsynerve stimulationresponsive neurostimulationseizures

Identifiers

PMID29963302
PMCPMC6009082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.