ArticleForensic toxicology2018
Rapid detection of
Article in Forensic toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Solid-phase chromogenic method combining molecularly imprinted polymer and Simon reaction for discriminating between methamphetamine and structural analogs.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025Article
- Forensic applications of DART-MS: A review of recent literature.Forensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020Review
- The Ion Source of Nitrogen Direct Analysis in Real-Time Mass Spectrometry as a Highly Efficient Reactor: Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePhenethylamines constitute the majority of drug-related arrests in Japan. Recently, the smuggling of
methodsIn this study, a rapid and accurate method for the detection of
resultsDuring GC-MS analysis of
conclusionsHence, DART-TOF-MS provides a rapid and accurate method for the detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.