Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29963194›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Clinical evaluation of 4 types of microRNA in serum as biomarkers of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Kai Wang, Dongmei Chen, Yue Meng, Jianjun Xu, Qingyun Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Deregulated miRNAs in osteoporosis: effects in bone metastasis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, P.R. China.
Dongmei ChenKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, P.R. China.
Yue MengKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, P.R. China.
Jianjun XuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, P.R. China.
Qingyun ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, P.R. China.
Peking University · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no specific biomarker for esophageal cancer used in clinical practice. However, studies consider that microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) could have useful implications in clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using serum microRNAs as biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, the expression levels of serum miR-21, miR-25, miR-145 and miR-203 were detected in 31 untreated patients with ESCC (EC-UT), 35 inactive period patients with ESCC following treatment (EC-T), 33 patients with esophageal benign disease (benign) and 32 healthy donors (healthy). Furthermore, the ability of these microRNAs to function as biomarkers of ESCC alone and in combination were investigated. The expression levels of serum miR-21, miR-25 and miR-145 in EC-UT were significantly higher than in the other groups (P<0.001). High sensitivity and specificity were shown when miRNAs were used as biomarkers for ESCC, particularly miR-21 and the combination of miR-21 with miR-145. Comparing EC-UT with healthy, benign and EC-T groups, and a combined group (3 groups set as 1 negative control), the sensitivity and specificity of miR-21 were 71.0 and 96.9, 74.2 and 87.9, 77.4 and 82.9, and 74.2 and 88.0%, respectively. The combined sensitivity and specificity of miR-21 and miR-145 were 71.0 and 96.9, 90.9 and 72.7, 97.1 and 82.9, and 80.6 and 80.0%, respectively. In conclusion, 3 types of miRNA (miR-21, miR-25 and miR-145) in serum could serve as potential biomarkers for ESCC. Furthermore, the expression level of miR-145 in serum was upregulated, compared with the downregulation reported in previous studies in ESCC tissues and cells.

Indexed as

biomarkeresophageal squamous cell carcinomareverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reactionserum microRNA

Identifiers

PMID29963194
PMCPMC6019944
OpenAlexW2803939161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.