Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29962815›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2018

Direct-acting antivirals and hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C: A few lights and many shadows.

Maria Guarino, Anna Sessa, Valentina Cossiga, Federica Morando, Nicola Caporaso, Filomena Morisco, Special Interest Group on “Hepatocellular carcinoma and new anti-HCV therapies” of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) in Egypt: A comprehensive overview.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria GuarinoFilomena Morisco, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80131, Italy.
Anna SessaFilomena Morisco, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80131, Italy.
Valentina CossigaFilomena Morisco, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80131, Italy.
Federica MorandoFilomena Morisco, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80131, Italy.
Nicola CaporasoFilomena Morisco, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80131, Italy. nicola.caporaso@unina.it.
Filomena Morisco
Special Interest Group on “Hepatocellular carcinoma and new anti-HCV therapies” of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the introduction of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA), the rate of sustained virological response (SVR) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) has radically improved to over 95%. Robust scientific evidence supports a beneficial role of SVR after interferon therapy in the progression of cirrhosis, resulting in a decreased incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, a debate on the impact of DAAs on the development of HCC is ongoing. This review aimed to analyse the scientific literature regarding the risk of HCC in terms of its recurrence and occurrence after the use of DAAs to eradicate HCV infection. Among 11 studies examining HCC occurrence, the de novo incidence rate ranged from 0 to 7.4% (maximum follow-up: 18 mo). Among 18 studies regarding HCC recurrence, the rate ranged from 0 to 54.4% (maximum "not well-defined" follow-up: 32 mo). This review highlights the major difficulties in interpreting data and reconciling the results of the included studies. These difficulties include heterogeneous cohorts, potential misclassifications of HCC prior to DAA therapy, the absence of an adequate control group, short follow-up times and different kinds of follow-up. Moreover, no clinical feature-based scoring system accounts for the molecular characteristics and pathobiology of the tumours. Nonetheless, this review does not suggest that there is a higher rate of

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease ProgressionHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHumansIncidenceLiverLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRisk FactorsSustained Virologic ResponseTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsDirect-acting antiviral agentsHepatitis C virusHepatocellular carcinomaOccurrenceRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID29962815
PMCPMC6021774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.