ArticleReading and writing2018
Differential Identification of Females and Males with Reading Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis.
Article in Reading and writing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interrogating the dependency of AAV capsids on AAVR for retinal transduction.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Validation of the Greek Version of the Colorado Learning Difficulties Questionnaire.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The relationship between lead levels and reading acquisition in Spanish speakers, evidence from Uruguayan schoolers.Neurotoxicology · 2024Article
- Dyscalculia and dyslexia in Chinese children with idiopathic epilepsy: Different patterns of prevalence, comorbidity, and gender differences.Epilepsia open · 2022Article
- Effect of absenteeism on the performance of medical sciences students: gender differences.Medical education online · 2021Article
- Co-occurrence of Reading Disabilities and Math Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2020Article
- First and Second Language Reading Difficulty Among Chinese-English Bilingual Children: The Prevalence and Influences From Demographic Characteristics.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- The Prevalence of Specific Learning Difficulties in Higher Education: A Study of UK Universities Across 12 Academic Years.Journal of learning disabilitiesArticle
- Specific Learning Difficulties: Disparities in Identification.Journal of learning disabilitiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Males are more likely than females to be identified as having reading difficulties, but it is unclear if this is a result of sample ascertainment or identification bias. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the magnitude of gender differences in reading difficulties using available studies in which researchers investigated this difference and an additional dataset with a representative U.S. SAMPLE: After conducting a literature search, sixteen studies and a restricted use dataset were included in the present analysis (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.